Proxiedmail

@Proxiedmail list all my current proxy bindings and show which addresses are forwarding to my main inbox

Found 3 active proxy bindings in your account. 'newsletter-signups@prx.example.com' forwards to user@domain.com (created Jan 15). 'job-applications@prx.example.com' forwards to user@domain.com (created Feb 3). 'vendor-trials@prx.example.com' forwards to user@domain.com (created Feb 20). All bindings are currently active with no filters applied.

This read-heavy example demonstrates listing proxy email addresses you've created. Requires a valid API key with read permissions. The actual binding IDs and timestamps will vary by account state — this illustrative output shows the kind of summary you'd see when managing multiple forwarding addresses.

@Proxiedmail update the 'newsletter-signups' binding to pause forwarding temporarily while I clean up my inbox

Updated proxy binding 'newsletter-signups@prx.example.com' (ID: pxb_abc123). Forwarding is now paused — incoming mail to this address will be held but not delivered to user@domain.com. You can re-enable forwarding anytime by updating the binding's active status. No emails will be lost during the pause period.

This write example shows modifying an existing proxy binding's behavior. You'll need the binding ID (obtained from a list operation first). Side-effect: emails sent to this proxy address won't reach your inbox until you reactivate forwarding. Useful for temporarily isolating high-volume senders.

@Proxiedmail create a new webhook receiver for incoming email events, then draft a Node.js snippet that logs sender addresses when emails arrive

Created webhook receiver at endpoint: https://webhooks.proxiedmail.com/recv/wh_xyz789. This URL will receive POST requests whenever an email hits any of your proxy addresses. Here's a basic Express handler: `app.post('/webhook', (req, res) => { const { from, to, subject } = req.body; console.log('Email from:', from); res.sendStatus(200); });` Remember to verify the webhook signature in production to prevent spoofing.

This synthesis example pairs webhook creation with AI-generated integration code. Webhooks let you build custom workflows (auto-tagging, CRM sync, spam analysis) beyond simple forwarding. You'll need to host the endpoint yourself and handle Proxiedmail's webhook payload format. Rate limits apply to webhook delivery retries.

When Proxiedmail makes sense for customer support triage

A 6-person support team fields inbound tickets from three channels: a shared inbox, a contact form, and partner escalations. They want each channel to route to a different Slack thread without exposing personal email addresses or spinning up a full helpdesk. Proxiedmail wins here because you can bind proxy addresses to each channel, update routing rules as the team grows, and capture webhook events when messages arrive. The API token flow is straightforward for a one-time setup script. The trade-off: if you're already paying for Zendesk or Intercom, their native routing is faster to configure. But if you're pre-product-market-fit and want disposable email endpoints that don't clutter your domain's MX records, this MCP gives you programmatic control without vendor lock-in. Set it up once, forget it until you need to add a new channel.

Proxiedmail for early-stage lead routing without a CRM

A 3-person startup runs landing pages for two pilot customers. Each page has a contact form that should notify a different founder via email, but they don't want to hardcode personal addresses in the HTML or pay for HubSpot yet. Proxiedmail lets you create a proxy binding per landing page, route replies to the right person, and update the binding when responsibilities shift. The webhook receiver tool is the key: you can log form submissions to a spreadsheet or trigger a Slack message without writing SMTP logic. The limitation: if you're collecting more than basic contact info (file uploads, multi-step forms), you'll need a real form backend like Typeform or Tally. Use this MCP when your lead volume is under 50 per week and you want email routing you can script in 20 lines of code.

When Proxiedmail beats disposable email services for QA

A 4-person dev team runs end-to-end tests that require email verification links. They used to rely on Mailinator, but public inboxes leak test data and rate-limit unpredictably. Proxiedmail gives each test run a unique proxy address, routes confirmations to a webhook, and lets you parse the verification link programmatically. The list proxy bindings tool is useful for cleanup: after a test suite finishes, you can enumerate and delete stale addresses. The catch: if your CI pipeline runs hundreds of tests in parallel, the 4-tool API surface might bottleneck on webhook delivery latency. This MCP is the right call when you're running 10-30 test scenarios per day and need deterministic email routing without maintaining your own SMTP relay. It's overkill for unit tests, perfect for integration tests that touch real email flows.