OpenRouter: Fusion
Fusion turns your prompt into a small multi-model deliberation. A panel of expert models (see below) analyzes your prompt in parallel with web search and web fetch enabled, then a...
Anyone in the Project can @-mention OpenRouter: Fusion with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Adaptive routing across multiple providers
- Prototyping without model selection overhead
- Workloads mixing simple and complex queries
- Teams experimenting with model diversity
Strengths
Fusion dynamically selects from OpenRouter's catalog based on query complexity, latency requirements, and cost constraints. This means simple queries hit cheaper models while complex reasoning tasks route to frontier models. The 1M token context window reflects the upper bound of its routing pool, giving you access to long-context capabilities when needed. It removes the burden of manual model switching for teams running varied workloads.
Trade-offs
You lose output consistency since different queries hit different models, making A/B testing and reproducibility harder. Pricing is opaque until after the call completes, complicating budget forecasting. You can't tune for a specific model's quirks or strengths, and debugging failures is harder when you don't know which underlying model processed your request. Teams needing deterministic behavior or strict cost controls should use direct model endpoints instead.
Specifications
- Provider
- openrouter
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 1,000,000 tokens
- Max output
- —
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2026-06-13
Pricing
- Input
- —
- Output
- —
- Model ID
openrouter/fusion
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| openrouter | 1000k | $0.00/Mtok | $0.00/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Mixed-Complexity Document Analysis
Extract all dates, names, and dollar amounts from this contract, then assess whether the liability clauses favor the buyer or seller and explain your reasoning in two paragraphs.Open in a Project →
Prototype Conversational Agent
You are a customer support assistant. Answer this user question clearly and concisely. If the question is straightforward, keep it brief. If it requires nuanced explanation, provide detailed reasoning.Open in a Project →
Cost-Aware Code Review
Review this Python function for style issues, potential bugs, and architectural improvements. Flag anything that violates PEP 8 and suggest refactors for better maintainability.Open in a Project →
Adaptive Research Summarization
Summarize this research paper in three parts: a two-sentence abstract, a paragraph on methodology, and a paragraph on implications for practitioners.Open in a Project →
Multi-Turn Reasoning Workflow
First, list the top five risks in this business plan. Then, for the highest-priority risk, draft a two-paragraph mitigation strategy with specific action items.Open in a Project →
Compare with
More language models
- Pareto Code Routeropenrouter
- Perceptron: Perceptron Mk1perceptron
- Perplexity: Sonarperplexity
- Perplexity: Sonar Deep Researchperplexity
- Perplexity: Sonar Properplexity
- Perplexity: Sonar Pro Searchperplexity
- Perplexity: Sonar Reasoning Properplexity
- Poolside: Laguna S 2.1poolside
- Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 (free)poolside
- Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1poolside
- Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1 (free)poolside
- Qwen2.5 72B Instructqwen