LLMgoogle

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...

Anyone in the Project can @-mention Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) is Google's asynchronous processing variant, trading real-time response for dramatically lower cost—$1 input/$6 output per Mtok makes it one of the cheapest capable models available. The million-token context window handles book-length documents, and native multimodal support (audio, video, image, file) means you can throw mixed-media datasets at it without preprocessing. Best for high-volume jobs where you can wait minutes to hours: document classification pipelines, batch video analysis, or cost-sensitive research workflows that need long-context reasoning.

Best for

  • High-volume document classification pipelines
  • Batch video content analysis
  • Cost-sensitive long-context research tasks
  • Multimodal dataset processing at scale
  • Asynchronous content moderation workflows

Strengths

The pricing is the headline: at $1/$6 per Mtok, this undercuts most competitors by 3-10x for batch workloads. The 1M token context window rivals Claude's extended offerings, making it viable for full-book summarization or codebase analysis. Native multimodal support—audio, video, image, file—eliminates transcription or OCR preprocessing steps. Batch mode suits workflows where latency doesn't matter: overnight processing runs, scheduled content audits, or research pipelines that can queue requests.

Trade-offs

Batch processing introduces latency—expect minutes to hours, not seconds. No public benchmarks yet means you're flying blind on quality relative to GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet; internal testing is mandatory before production use. Google's API ecosystem lags OpenAI's in tooling maturity, so expect more integration friction. The 'preview' label signals this is pre-stable: features and pricing may shift. If you need real-time responses or proven benchmark performance, standard Gemini Pro or competitors are safer bets.

Specifications

Provider
google
Category
llm
Context length
1,048,576 tokens
Max output
65,536 tokens
Modalities
audio, file, image, text, video
License
proprietary
Released
2026-02-19

Pricing

Input
$1.00/Mtok
Output
$6.00/Mtok
Model ID
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview:batch

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
$44.00
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
google1049k$1.00/Mtok$6.00/Mtok———

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Projects have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Projects per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Batch Video Transcript Analysis

Analyze these video files for recurring themes, speaker sentiment, and key decision points. Provide a structured summary with timestamps for each major topic shift.

Multi-Document Policy Comparison

Compare these three policy documents (totaling 800K tokens) and identify contradictions, gaps in coverage, and areas where requirements conflict. Output a table with specific section references.

Cost-Optimized Code Review

Review this codebase for security vulnerabilities, deprecated patterns, and opportunities to reduce complexity. Prioritize findings by severity and provide file-level recommendations.

Multimodal Dataset Labeling

Label each item in this dataset (images, audio clips, text snippets) with category tags, confidence scores, and a brief justification. Flag any items that don't fit the provided taxonomy.

Overnight Content Moderation

Review these user submissions for policy violations: hate speech, misinformation, copyright concerns. For each flagged item, cite the specific policy clause and recommend action (remove, warn, allow with note).

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Analyze this 45-minute earnings call recording and extract: (1) forward guidance changes, (2) management sentiment shifts from Q3, (3) any hedging language around supply chain. Output as structured bullet points.

Output

This example would demonstrate the model processing a multi-modal input (audio file) and returning structured analysis. The model would transcribe the call, identify temporal references to Q3, flag conditional phrases like 'if market conditions permit' or 'subject to supplier availability', and organize findings into three distinct sections. With the 1M+ token context window, the entire 45-minute call fits in a single request, preserving conversational context that shorter-window models would fragment.

Notes

Showcases the model's multi-modal strength and massive context capacity — critical for document-heavy workflows. The batch processing mode means this isn't real-time; you'd submit the job and retrieve results later, trading immediacy for cost efficiency at $1/$6 per Mtok versus real-time pricing.

Prompt

I'm uploading 8 architectural PDFs (site plans, elevations, mechanical drawings) for a mixed-use development. Identify any conflicts between the civil site plan's stormwater routing and the landscape architect's planting zones in sheets C-201 and L-101.

Output

This example would show the model ingesting multiple large PDF files simultaneously, cross-referencing sheet callouts, and identifying spatial conflicts. The output would cite specific drawing coordinates (e.g., 'Grid line D between stations 3+20 and 3+45') where a proposed bioswale overlaps an underground detention system, then suggest whether the landscape or civil design should yield based on code priorities visible in the title blocks.

Notes

Highlights file-handling and cross-document reasoning across a 1M+ token budget — eight technical PDFs easily fit. The model can hold all sheets in context simultaneously rather than requiring multi-pass retrieval. Batch mode suits this workflow since design review isn't time-critical and the $1 input cost makes bulk document analysis economical.

Prompt

Here's a 90-second product demo video. Write a technical FAQ covering the three features shown, anticipate two common objections based on competitor positioning, and draft responses a solutions engineer would give.

Output

This example would demonstrate video comprehension: the model would describe on-screen UI interactions, infer feature benefits from voiceover narration and visual cues, then generate six FAQ entries (three feature explainers, two objection handlers with rebuttals). The responses would match a solutions engineer's tone — specific on capabilities, acknowledging trade-offs where the competitor has an edge, redirecting to differentiated strengths.

Notes

Shows video modality and reasoning about competitive context the model must infer (not stated in the video itself). The batch processing constraint means you can't use this interactively during a live demo prep call — you'd queue the job, then retrieve polished FAQ copy 15-30 minutes later at significantly lower cost than synchronous API calls.

Use-case deep-dives

Multi-format research synthesis

When batch processing wins for mixed-media research teams

A 4-person policy shop ingests 200+ documents weekly—PDFs, audio briefings, video testimony, spreadsheets—and needs structured summaries by Friday. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles all five modalities in one call, and the batch endpoint cuts input cost to $1/Mtok (83% cheaper than real-time). The 1M-token window means you can drop an entire hearing transcript plus supporting exhibits into a single request. Run the batch overnight Thursday, review summaries Friday morning. This works if your turnaround is 12+ hours and you're processing 50+ mixed-format files per week. Below that volume, the batch setup overhead outweighs the savings—stick with a real-time multi-modal model and pay the convenience premium.

Video content moderation pipeline

Batch video analysis for high-volume content platforms

A 12-person creator platform reviews 800 uploaded videos daily for policy violations before publishing. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's native video understanding removes the transcription step, and batch pricing makes the economics work at scale—$1 input means analyzing a 10-minute video costs roughly $0.15 in tokens. Queue uploads as they arrive, process the batch every 2 hours, flag violations for human review. The model sees visual context (not just speech), so it catches issues transcripts miss. This setup works when you can tolerate 2-hour review latency and process 500+ videos/day. If you need sub-30-minute moderation or handle under 200 videos daily, real-time endpoints justify the 6x cost increase because batch overhead kills your velocity.

Quarterly financial document analysis

When batch mode handles periodic deep-document work

A 3-person investment fund analyzes 150 earnings reports each quarter—10-Ks, call transcripts, slide decks—extracting risk factors and guidance changes into a comparison table. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's 1M-token window fits an entire 10-K plus exhibits in one prompt, and batch pricing ($1 input) makes the quarterly spike affordable. Load all 150 documents Friday after market close, run the batch over the weekend, review extracted data Monday. The multi-modal support handles both text filings and PDF charts without preprocessing. This works for periodic high-volume work (quarterly, annual) where 48-hour turnaround is fine. If you need daily earnings analysis or process under 50 documents per cycle, real-time models cost more per token but save enough analyst time to break even.

Frequently asked

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview good for general text tasks?

Yes, though without public benchmarks it's hard to quantify exactly where it sits. The 1M token context window makes it excellent for document analysis, long conversations, and multi-file reasoning. At $1/$6 per Mtok, it's positioned as a mid-tier option. If you need proven performance metrics before committing, wait for benchmark data or test it yourself on your specific workload.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than GPT-4o?

Yes on input, no on output. GPT-4o runs $2.50/$10 per Mtok, so Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs 60% less for input but 40% less for output. For read-heavy tasks like summarization or analysis, Gemini wins. For generation-heavy work like content creation, GPT-4o is cheaper per token. Calculate based on your actual input/output ratio.

Can it handle audio and video analysis in the same prompt?

Yes, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports audio, video, images, files, and text in multimodal prompts. The 1M token context means you can feed it lengthy video files or multiple audio recordings alongside documents. This makes it useful for meeting transcription with slides, video content moderation, or multimedia research tasks where you need cross-modal reasoning in one request.

How does the batch API version differ from real-time Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Batch processing trades speed for cost. You submit jobs, they queue, and results arrive hours later instead of seconds. Pricing is typically 50% cheaper than real-time, though Google hasn't published separate batch rates here. Use batch for bulk document processing, dataset labeling, or overnight analysis jobs. Don't use it for chat, live support, or anything user-facing.

Should I use this for production without benchmark data?

Only if you can afford to test thoroughly first. No public benchmarks means you're flying blind on accuracy, reasoning depth, and failure modes compared to alternatives. Run your own evals on representative tasks before committing. If you need proven reliability today, stick with GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, or other models with published MMLU, HumanEval, and domain-specific scores.

Compare with

More language models

See all language models →

Data last verified 13 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.