LLMgoogle

Google: Gemini Pro Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Gemini Pro family.

Anyone in the Project can @-mention Google: Gemini Pro Latest with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

Gemini Pro Latest is Google's multimodal workhorse with a massive 1M token context window and competitive pricing at $2/$12 per Mtok. It handles audio, video, images, and files natively, making it the go-to for teams processing mixed-media content or long documents without chunking. The trade-off: without public benchmarks, you're relying on Google's internal claims until you test it yourself. Reach for this when you need multimodal reasoning across huge contexts at a price point that undercuts GPT-4o.

Best for

  • Long-document analysis with embedded media
  • Video content summarization and Q&A
  • Cost-sensitive multimodal workflows
  • Processing mixed file types in one pass
  • Audio transcription with contextual reasoning

Strengths

The 1M token window lets you drop entire codebases, hour-long meeting recordings, or multi-chapter documents without preprocessing. Native multimodal support means you can ask questions about a PDF with embedded charts, a video with audio, or a presentation deck in a single request. At $2 input and $12 output per Mtok, it's priced 40% below GPT-4o for comparable multimodal tasks, making it viable for high-volume production workloads.

Trade-offs

The absence of public benchmarks means you can't compare reasoning quality, instruction-following, or coding ability against Claude or GPT-4o before committing. Google's models historically lag OpenAI and Anthropic on complex reasoning tasks and nuanced instruction adherence, though this gap has narrowed. Video and audio processing quality is unproven in third-party evaluations, so plan to run your own tests before scaling.

Specifications

Provider
google
Category
llm
Context length
1,048,576 tokens
Max output
943,718 tokens
Modalities
audio, file, image, text, video
License
proprietary
Released
2026-04-27

Pricing

Input
$2.00/Mtok
Output
$10.00/Mtok
Model ID
~google/gemini-pro-latest

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
$77.44
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
google1049k$2.00/Mtok$12.00/Mtok———

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Projects have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Projects per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Analyze Meeting Recording

Watch this recorded meeting and list all action items assigned to specific people, decisions made, and unresolved questions. Include timestamps for each.

Summarize Technical PDF

Read this technical document and provide a 300-word summary for a non-technical executive. Explain any charts or diagrams inline.

Code Review Across Files

Review these 15 Python files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and adherence to PEP 8. Prioritize findings by severity.

Video Content Q&A

Watch this product demo video and answer: What are the three main features shown? At what timestamps do they appear? What objections does the presenter address?

Multi-Document Synthesis

I've uploaded 20 customer interview transcripts. Identify the top 5 feature requests by frequency, quote supporting evidence, and note any conflicting feedback.

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Analyze this quarterly sales spreadsheet and identify the three product categories with declining revenue. Explain what might be causing each decline based on the seasonal patterns in the data.

Output

The model would process the uploaded spreadsheet and return a structured analysis identifying Electronics (-12% QoQ), Home & Garden (-8% QoQ), and Sporting Goods (-15% QoQ) as the declining categories. For Electronics, it would note the post-holiday slump typical in Q2. For Home & Garden, it would correlate the decline with delayed spring weather patterns visible in regional breakdowns. For Sporting Goods, it would flag increased competition from a new market entrant mentioned in the notes column. The analysis would include specific row references and suggest filtering the data by region to confirm hypotheses.

Notes

Gemini Pro Latest's 1M+ token context window handles large spreadsheets without summarization loss, letting it cross-reference notes columns with numerical trends. The multimodal file input means no manual data extraction. However, at $12/Mtok output, verbose analyses of complex datasets get expensive quickly compared to text-only alternatives.

Prompt

I'm attaching a 40-minute recorded team meeting (video). Summarize the three action items assigned, who owns each one, and flag any points where team members disagreed on priority.

Output

The model would process the video file and produce a meeting summary: Action items include (1) Sarah finalizing the Q3 budget by Friday, (2) Marcus scheduling vendor demos for the new CRM by month-end, and (3) the design team delivering mockups by Tuesday. It would note that at the 18-minute mark, Sarah and Marcus disagreed on whether the CRM evaluation should precede or follow the budget lock—Sarah argued budget constraints should guide vendor selection, while Marcus wanted feature requirements defined first. The model would timestamp each action item's mention.

Notes

Native video processing eliminates transcription steps, and the extended context means the entire 40-minute meeting stays in working memory for cross-referencing. This showcases the model's multimodal strength. The trade-off: video processing burns tokens faster than text transcripts, making this approach costly for routine meeting notes compared to audio-only pipelines.

Prompt

Review this Python codebase (12 files, ~3,000 lines) and explain how the authentication flow works from login request to session creation. Include which files handle each step and where potential security issues might exist.

Output

The model would trace the authentication flow across the uploaded files: Login requests hit `api/auth.py` (lines 45-89), which validates credentials against `models/user.py`. Successful validation triggers `services/session.py` to generate a JWT token using the secret in `config/settings.py`. The token gets stored in Redis via `cache/session_store.py` with a 24-hour TTL. It would flag two concerns: the JWT secret is hardcoded rather than environment-variable-based (security risk), and `session.py` lacks rate limiting on token generation (potential DoS vector). The explanation would reference specific line numbers and function names.

Notes

The 1M token context ingests the entire codebase at once, enabling whole-system reasoning that catches cross-file security patterns. This beats chunked analysis for architectural questions. The limitation: at $2/Mtok input, repeatedly uploading large codebases for iterative questions costs more than maintaining a dedicated code-analysis tool with persistent context.

Use-case deep-dives

Quarterly video content audit

Gemini Pro Latest for low-frequency video analysis with image and audio

A 5-person brand team audits 40 hours of customer testimonial video each quarter to tag themes, sentiment, and visual brand consistency. Gemini Pro Latest processes video natively, so you skip transcription services and frame-extraction scripts—upload the MP4, prompt for themes, and get structured output. At $2/Mtok input, a 2-hour video (roughly 200k tokens of multimodal data) costs $0.40 to ingest; a 5k-token summary costs $0.06 to generate. The 1M-token context means you can batch 10 videos in one prompt for cross-video pattern detection. The trade-off: this only pencils if you run the audit quarterly or less; weekly video analysis at scale will push output costs past $50/month, at which point a cheaper text-only model with separate transcription is faster and cheaper. For infrequent, high-context video work, this is the right tool.

Frequently asked

Is Gemini Pro Latest good for general-purpose tasks?

Yes. With a 1M token context window and multimodal support for text, images, audio, video, and files, it handles most general-purpose work well. The lack of public benchmarks makes direct performance comparisons harder, but the massive context window suits document analysis, long conversations, and complex reasoning tasks where you need to reference large amounts of information.

Is Gemini Pro Latest cheaper than GPT-4?

Yes, significantly. At $2 per million input tokens and $12 per million output tokens, it undercuts GPT-4 Turbo ($10/$30) and GPT-4o ($2.50/$10) on input while matching 4o's output pricing. For input-heavy workloads like document processing or RAG systems, the cost advantage is substantial. Output-heavy generation tasks cost roughly the same as GPT-4o.

Can it process hour-long video files in a single request?

Likely yes, given the 1M token context window and native video support. An hour of video typically fits within that limit when encoded efficiently. However, processing speed and quality depend on Google's video tokenization approach, which isn't publicly documented. Test with your specific video format and resolution to confirm latency and accuracy meet your requirements.

How does Gemini Pro Latest compare to previous Gemini versions?

Google doesn't publish version-specific benchmarks for the "Latest" endpoint, so direct comparisons are difficult. The 1M context window matches Gemini 1.5 Pro's capability. The "Latest" designation means you automatically get model updates, which can be an advantage for staying current or a risk if consistency matters. For production systems requiring stable behavior, pin to a specific dated version instead.

Should I use this for real-time customer support chat?

Probably not as your first choice. The $12/Mtok output pricing makes high-volume chat expensive compared to GPT-4o Mini ($0.60) or Claude Haiku ($1.25). The 1M context window is overkill for most support conversations. Use it when you need multimodal inputs or must reference extensive documentation in-context. For standard text chat, cheaper models deliver better economics.

Compare with

More language models

See all language models →

Data last verified 13 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.