LLMopenai

OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Nano (batch)

For tasks that demand low latency, GPT‑4.1 nano is the fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series. It delivers exceptional performance at a small size with its 1 million...

Anyone in the Project can @-mention OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

GPT-4.1 Nano is OpenAI's batch-optimized variant of their smallest GPT-4.1 model, trading real-time responsiveness for dramatically lower costs. At $0.05 per million input tokens, it undercuts standard GPT-4.1 pricing by 90% while maintaining the same 1M+ context window and multimodal capabilities. The catch: batch jobs can take up to 24 hours to complete. Reach for this when you're processing large document sets, running nightly data enrichment pipelines, or generating training data where latency doesn't matter but budget does.

Best for

  • Overnight document classification at scale
  • Batch synthetic data generation
  • Cost-sensitive multimodal analysis jobs
  • Large-scale content moderation queues
  • Nightly report generation from logs

Strengths

The pricing is the headline: $0.05 input makes this one of the cheapest ways to access GPT-4-class reasoning on large contexts. The 1M+ token window handles book-length documents or hundreds of screenshots in a single job. Multimodal support means you can batch-process mixed text and image workloads without switching models. For teams running recurring analysis jobs or building datasets, the 24-hour SLA is irrelevant and the cost savings compound quickly.

Trade-offs

Batch processing means zero interactivity — you submit jobs and wait up to 24 hours for results, making this unusable for user-facing features or iterative workflows. As the smallest GPT-4.1 variant, Nano likely trails larger siblings on complex reasoning and nuanced instruction-following, though OpenAI hasn't published comparative benchmarks. The lack of public eval data makes it hard to gauge performance against peers like Claude Haiku or Gemini Flash in the same price tier.

Specifications

Provider
openai
Category
llm
Context length
1,047,576 tokens
Max output
32,768 tokens
Modalities
image, text, file
License
proprietary
Released
2025-04-14

Pricing

Input
$0.05/Mtok
Output
$0.20/Mtok
Model ID
openai/gpt-4.1-nano:batch

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
$1.67
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
openai1048k$0.05/Mtok$0.20/Mtok———

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Projects have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Projects per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Classify Support Tickets

Classify this support ticket into category (billing, technical, account, other) and urgency (low, medium, high, critical). Return JSON with 'category', 'urgency', and a one-sentence 'reason' field.

Extract Invoice Data

Extract the following fields from this invoice image: vendor_name, invoice_number, date, total_amount, line_items (array of {description, quantity, unit_price}). Return valid JSON only.

Generate Training Examples

Generate 5 realistic customer service questions about [product/topic] and provide detailed, helpful answers for each. Vary the tone and complexity across questions.

Summarize Research Papers

Read this research paper and provide: (1) a 2-sentence summary, (2) the main methodology, (3) key findings as bullet points, (4) limitations mentioned by authors. Be precise and cite specific sections.

Enrich Product Descriptions

Rewrite this product description to be more engaging and SEO-friendly. Keep factual details intact, add benefits-focused language, and ensure it's 80-120 words. Maintain the original tone.

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Review this Python function for edge cases. It's supposed to parse ISO timestamps but users report crashes on malformed input.

Output

The function assumes well-formed ISO strings and will raise ValueError on malformed input like '2024-13-45' or partial strings. Add try-except around datetime.fromisoformat() and return None or a sentinel for invalid input. Also check for timezone-naive vs timezone-aware mismatches if you're comparing timestamps later—fromisoformat() preserves the input's timezone state, which can cause TypeError in comparisons. Consider validating the string format with a regex before parsing if you need granular error messages.

Notes

GPT-4.1 Nano's 1M+ token context window means it can review entire codebases in one pass, catching edge cases across multiple files. The batch pricing ($0.05 input) makes large-scale code review economical. Trade-off: batch processing introduces latency—responses arrive asynchronously, not real-time.

Prompt

Summarise the key risks and mitigation strategies from these three uploaded board meeting transcripts (47 pages total).

Output

Across the three meetings, the board identified supply chain fragility (single-source dependencies in APAC), regulatory exposure (new EU data residency rules), and talent retention (15% attrition in engineering). Mitigations proposed: diversify suppliers to include North American vendors by Q3, hire a compliance lead for EU operations, and introduce equity refresh grants tied to two-year vesting. The CFO noted that supplier diversification may increase COGS by 8-12% short-term.

Notes

The 1M+ token context window handles long documents without chunking or lossy summarisation. File upload support means users can attach PDFs directly. Trade-off: batch mode means this isn't suitable for live meeting summarisation—it's for post-hoc analysis where 10-30 minute response times are acceptable.

Prompt

Generate five headline options for a product launch announcement. The product is a B2B API for real-time fraud detection. Tone: authoritative but not alarmist.

Output

1. 'New API Flags Fraudulent Transactions in Under 200ms' 2. 'Real-Time Fraud Detection Now Available via REST API' 3. 'Reduce Chargebacks with Millisecond-Level Fraud Scoring' 4. 'API Launch: Inline Fraud Analysis for Payment Flows' 5. 'Fraud Detection API Integrates with Existing Payment Stacks' All five avoid fear-based language ('stop fraud before it's too late') and focus on speed, integration ease, and measurable outcomes. Option 3 ties directly to a business metric (chargebacks), which may resonate most with finance stakeholders.

Notes

GPT-4.1 Nano handles creative briefs with nuance—it internalised 'authoritative but not alarmist' and avoided hyperbole. The model's multimodal support means you could include brand guidelines as an image. Trade-off: batch pricing is cost-effective for bulk content generation, but the async workflow isn't ideal for iterative creative refinement.

Use-case deep-dives

Batch document classification

Why GPT-4.1 Nano batch mode wins for overnight tagging jobs

A 12-person legal ops team needs to classify 8,000 intake emails every night into 14 categories before the morning shift. GPT-4.1 Nano in batch mode costs $0.05/Mtok on input—half the price of real-time calls—and the 1M+ token context window means you can pack classification examples and schema into a single prompt without chunking. Run the job at 11pm, results land by 6am, and you're spending $40/month instead of $320. The trade-off: batch jobs queue for up to 24 hours, so this only works if you can wait. If you need sub-minute turnaround during business hours, pay for real-time. For nightly or weekly jobs where latency doesn't matter, batch mode is the call.

High-volume image moderation

When to route user-uploaded images through GPT-4.1 Nano batch

A 4-person marketplace startup gets 2,000 product photos uploaded daily and needs to flag policy violations before listings go live. GPT-4.1 Nano handles images and text in the same call, so you send the photo plus a 200-word policy doc in one request. At $0.05 input / $0.20 output per Mtok, you're paying roughly $0.0003 per image—$9/month for 30k images. The catch: batch mode queues up to 24 hours, so you can't use this for real-time moderation during checkout. Run it overnight on the previous day's uploads, auto-approve clean images, and route flagged ones to manual review in the morning. If you need instant moderation, switch to real-time at 2x the cost.

Weekly contract summarization

How a 3-person procurement team uses batch mode for vendor contracts

A procurement team reviews 40 vendor contracts every Friday—each 15-30 pages—and needs a 1-page summary with key terms, renewal dates, and liability caps. GPT-4.1 Nano's 1M+ token context window fits an entire contract plus the summary template in one call, no chunking or stitching. Batch pricing at $0.05/$0.20 per Mtok means 40 contracts cost about $2. Upload the PDFs Thursday night, summaries land Friday morning, and the team spends their time negotiating instead of reading boilerplate. The boundary: if you're reviewing contracts ad-hoc throughout the week and need answers in under an hour, batch mode's queue time kills the workflow. For weekly or monthly batches, it's the right call.

Frequently asked

Is GPT-4.1 Nano good for high-volume batch processing?

Yes, that's exactly what it's designed for. The batch endpoint trades real-time responses for 50% cost savings over standard API calls. With 1M+ token context and $0.05/Mtok input pricing, it's ideal for processing large document sets, bulk content generation, or overnight data analysis jobs where 24-hour turnaround is acceptable.

Is GPT-4.1 Nano cheaper than Claude for batch jobs?

GPT-4.1 Nano undercuts Claude 3.5 Sonnet batch ($1.50/$7.50 per Mtok) by 97% on input and 97% on output. Even Claude 3 Haiku batch ($0.40/$2.00) costs 8x more on input and 10x more on output. If you're running high-volume batch workloads and quality differences are negligible for your use case, Nano wins on pure economics.

Can GPT-4.1 Nano handle million-token documents in one request?

The 1,047,576 token context window supports it technically, but practical limits depend on your batch job structure and OpenAI's processing queue. For documents approaching 1M tokens, test with representative samples first. Splitting into 200-500K token chunks often yields faster processing and easier error recovery without sacrificing context quality.

How does GPT-4.1 Nano compare to GPT-4o for batch work?

Nano trades some reasoning capability for dramatically lower cost—GPT-4o batch runs $1.25/$5.00 per Mtok, making Nano 25x cheaper on input and 25x cheaper on output. Without public benchmarks, quality comparison is unclear, but if your batch tasks are classification, extraction, or templated generation rather than complex reasoning, Nano likely delivers 80% of the value at 4% of the price.

Should I use GPT-4.1 Nano for production chatbots?

No. Batch endpoints process requests asynchronously with up to 24-hour delays, making them unusable for real-time chat. Use GPT-4o mini ($0.15/$0.60 per Mtok) or GPT-4o for chat applications. Reserve Nano for backend workflows where you can queue requests and wait—content moderation pipelines, nightly report generation, or bulk data enrichment.

Compare with

More language models

See all language models →

Data last verified 13 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.