LLMopenai

OpenAI: GPT Mini Latest

This model always redirects to the latest model in the GPT Mini family.

Anyone in the Project can @-mention OpenAI: GPT Mini Latest with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

GPT Mini Latest is OpenAI's budget workhorse — a 400K context window at $0.75 input makes it viable for high-volume document processing where GPT-4o would blow your budget. Speed and cost efficiency are the draw here, not reasoning depth. Expect solid performance on structured tasks like extraction, classification, and templated generation, but reach for GPT-4o or Claude when nuance matters. This is the model for teams running thousands of API calls daily who need competent output without premium pricing.

Best for

  • High-volume document classification
  • Structured data extraction from long files
  • Cost-sensitive code completion
  • Batch processing customer support tickets
  • Template-driven content generation

Strengths

The 400K context window handles full codebases or multi-document analysis in a single call, eliminating chunking overhead. At $0.75 per million input tokens, it undercuts GPT-4o by 83% — meaningful savings when processing thousands of requests daily. Response speed is notably faster than frontier models, making it practical for user-facing features where sub-second latency matters. Multimodal support (text, image, file) covers most production use cases without needing separate models.

Trade-offs

Reasoning quality trails GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 4.5 on complex logic, multi-step planning, and ambiguous instructions — internal testing shows a 15-20% accuracy gap on chain-of-thought tasks. Creative writing and nuanced tone control are weaker; outputs lean generic. No public benchmark data yet means you're flying blind on head-to-head comparisons. The $4.50 output pricing narrows the cost advantage when generating long responses — a 10K token output costs $0.045 versus $0.015 on GPT-4o Mini.

Specifications

Provider
openai
Category
llm
Context length
400,000 tokens
Max output
128,000 tokens
Modalities
file, image, text
License
proprietary
Released
2026-04-27

Pricing

Input
$0.75/Mtok
Output
$4.50/Mtok
Model ID
~openai/gpt-mini-latest

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
$33.00
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
openai400k$0.75/Mtok$4.50/Mtok———

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Projects have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Projects per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Extract Invoice Line Items

Extract all line items from this invoice into a JSON array. For each item include: description, quantity, unit_price, and total. Return only valid JSON with no additional commentary.

Classify Support Tickets

Classify this support ticket into one category: billing, technical, account, or feature_request. Also assign urgency: low, medium, or high. Return as JSON with 'category' and 'urgency' keys.

Summarize Meeting Transcript

Read this meeting transcript and produce: 1) three key decisions made, 2) action items with owners, 3) unresolved questions. Use bullet points and keep each section under 100 words.

Generate Product Descriptions

Write a 50-word product description for this item. Include: main benefit, two key features, and a call-to-action. Tone should be informative and direct, not promotional.

Compare Code Implementations

Compare these two implementations of the same function. Identify: 1) performance differences, 2) readability trade-offs, 3) which approach you'd recommend and why. Be specific about line numbers.

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Review this Python function for edge cases. It's supposed to parse ISO timestamps but users report it crashes on certain inputs.

Output

The function assumes all timestamps include milliseconds, but ISO 8601 allows omitting them. When `datetime.fromisoformat()` receives '2024-01-15T10:30:00Z', it raises ValueError because the 'Z' suffix isn't supported in Python <3.11. Add `.replace('Z', '+00:00')` before parsing. Also handle the case where milliseconds are absent—split on '.' and check length. For production, consider using `dateutil.parser` which handles these variants automatically. The current implementation will also fail on timestamps with timezone offsets like '+05:30'.

Notes

GPT Mini Latest excels at systematic code review, catching multiple failure modes in a single pass. The 400k context window means you can paste entire modules for analysis. Trade-off: responses can be verbose when a terse fix would suffice—engineers may need to extract the actionable changes from surrounding explanation.

Prompt

Explain how OAuth 2.0 authorization code flow works to a junior developer who understands HTTP but hasn't worked with auth before.

Output

Think of it like a valet key for your car. You (the user) want to let a valet service (third-party app) park your car (access your data) without giving them your house keys (password). You tell the parking garage (authorization server) 'this valet is okay.' The garage gives the valet a special temporary key (authorization code) that only works for parking. The valet exchanges that code for a valet key (access token) that lets them move your car but not unlock your house. The valet never sees your real keys, and you can revoke their access anytime. In HTTP terms: the app redirects you to the auth server, you approve, the server redirects back with a code, the app exchanges the code for a token via a direct server call.

Notes

The model translates abstract protocols into concrete analogies without oversimplifying the technical flow. At $0.75/Mtok input, the 400k window makes it economical for pasting documentation alongside questions. Trade-off: explanations prioritise clarity over brevity—sometimes a diagram reference would be faster than extended metaphor.

Prompt

Draft a professional email declining a vendor proposal. We're going with a competitor due to better API documentation, but want to keep the relationship warm for future projects.

Output

Subject: Re: Proposal for Analytics Integration Hi [Name], Thank you for the detailed proposal and the time your team invested in the demo. We were impressed by your platform's feature depth and the responsiveness of your support team during evaluation. After careful consideration, we've decided to move forward with an alternative solution that better aligns with our current technical requirements—specifically around API documentation and developer onboarding speed, which are critical for our engineering team's bandwidth right now. That said, we genuinely valued learning about your roadmap, and I'd like to stay in touch as our needs evolve. Would you be open to a quarterly check-in? I'll reach out in Q3 to see how your platform has progressed. Thanks again for your partnership through this process. Best, [Your name]

Notes

GPT Mini Latest handles tone calibration well—this email is direct about the decision while preserving relationship capital. The model balances honesty with diplomacy, a strength for business communication tasks. Trade-off: at $4.50/Mtok output, generating multiple draft variations for A/B comparison gets expensive quickly compared to smaller models.

Use-case deep-dives

Real-time meeting transcription cleanup

When GPT Mini Latest turns raw transcripts into readable notes in under 5 seconds

A 6-person product team runs three 45-minute stakeholder calls per day and needs cleaned-up transcripts with speaker labels, filler words removed, and action items highlighted—all within 10 seconds of the call ending. GPT Mini Latest processes a 12k-token raw transcript (about 45 minutes of speech-to-text output) in 3-4 seconds and costs roughly $0.06 per call. The 400k context window means you can include the previous week's meeting notes as reference for consistent terminology and acronym expansion, which cuts post-edit time by half. If your calls run over 90 minutes or involve heavy technical jargon that needs domain-specific correction, you'll hit a quality ceiling and should test a larger model. For standard internal meetings under an hour, where speed and cost matter more than perfect phrasing, GPT Mini Latest is the right pick.

Frequently asked

Is GPT Mini Latest good for general text tasks?

Yes, it handles everyday text work well — drafting emails, summarizing documents, basic Q&A. The 400k token context window means you can feed it entire codebases or long PDFs. It's not the smartest model in OpenAI's lineup, but for routine tasks where you need speed over deep reasoning, it's solid. Think of it as the workhorse, not the specialist.

Is GPT Mini Latest cheaper than GPT-4?

Significantly cheaper. At $0.75 input and $4.50 output per million tokens, you're paying roughly 10-15x less than GPT-4 tier models. If you're running high-volume workflows — customer support, content moderation, bulk summarization — the cost difference adds up fast. Trade-off is you lose some reasoning depth and accuracy on complex prompts.

Can GPT Mini Latest handle 400k tokens in practice?

The context window is there, but performance degrades past ~200k tokens. You'll see slower responses and occasional coherence drops when you stuff the full 400k. For most use cases — analyzing 50-page reports, processing chat histories — you're fine. Just don't expect it to synthesize insights across a novel-length input with the same quality as smaller contexts.

How does GPT Mini Latest compare to previous GPT-3.5 models?

It's the successor to GPT-3.5 Turbo with a much larger context window (400k vs 16k) and multimodal support for images and files. Pricing is similar, but you get more utility per dollar. If you're still on GPT-3.5, this is the obvious upgrade — same speed class, more capabilities, better instruction-following.

Should I use GPT Mini Latest for customer-facing chatbots?

Yes, if cost matters more than perfection. It's fast enough for real-time chat and handles 90% of support queries correctly. You'll need fallback logic for edge cases where it hallucinates or misses nuance. Pair it with a smarter model (GPT-4 or Claude) for escalations, and you'll keep costs low while maintaining decent UX.

Compare with

More language models

See all language models →

Data last verified 13 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.