xAI: Grok Latest
This model always redirects to the latest Grok model from xAI.
Anyone in the Project can @-mention xAI: Grok Latest with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Long-document analysis under budget constraints
- Multi-file code review and refactoring
- Legal or research corpus summarization
- Cost-sensitive image and text workflows
Strengths
The 500K context window matches Claude Opus 4 while undercutting it on price — $2 input versus $3, $6 output versus $15. This makes Grok Latest viable for tasks that require ingesting entire repositories, lengthy transcripts, or stacks of PDFs in a single prompt. Multimodal support (text, image, file) covers common team workflows without requiring separate models. The pricing structure favors input-heavy workloads, where you load large contexts but generate concise outputs.
Trade-offs
Public benchmark results are not yet available, so you lack the MMLU, HumanEval, or GPQA scores that let you compare reasoning and coding quality against Claude, GPT-4o, or Gemini. Early adopters report variability in instruction-following precision compared to frontier models. The output pricing ($6/Mtok) is competitive but not the cheapest — Gemini Flash 2.0 costs $0.30 for similar tasks. If your workflow generates verbose outputs or requires proven benchmark performance, you may hit friction.
Specifications
- Provider
- x-ai
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 500,000 tokens
- Max output
- 450,000 tokens
- Modalities
- text, image, file
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2026-07-08
Pricing
- Input
- $2.00/Mtok
- Output
- $6.00/Mtok
- Model ID
~x-ai/grok-latest
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Codebase Architecture Review
Review the attached codebase files. Identify architectural patterns, highlight tight coupling or circular dependencies, and recommend three concrete refactorings to improve maintainability.Open in a Project →
Multi-Document Research Synthesis
Read the attached research papers. Extract the core thesis from each, identify overlapping findings, and summarize the three most significant disagreements or gaps in the literature.Open in a Project →
Legal Contract Comparison
Compare the attached contracts. Flag any clauses where liability caps, termination terms, or IP assignment differ. Summarize the differences in a table.Open in a Project →
Screenshot-to-Code Conversion
Convert the attached screenshot into semantic HTML and Tailwind CSS. Preserve spacing, typography, and layout hierarchy. Output clean, production-ready code.Open in a Project →
Meeting Transcript Action Items
Read the attached meeting transcript. List every decision made, every action item assigned (with owner), and any unresolved questions. Format as a bulleted list.Open in a Project →