LLMtencent

Tencent: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is Tencent's flagship translation model in the Hy-MT2 family. It supports 33 language pairs and five Chinese dialect and minority-language pairs, with workflows for structured, delimiter-based, contextual, glossary-based, and...

Anyone in the Project can @-mention Tencent: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

Tencent's Hy-MT2-30B is a compact 30B parameter model optimized for Chinese-English translation and multilingual tasks, with an 8K context window and aggressive pricing at $0.07/$0.29 per Mtok. The small context window limits document-length work, and the lack of public benchmarks makes performance claims hard to verify independently. Reach for this when you need cost-effective Chinese↔English translation at scale and can validate output quality within your domain before committing.

Best for

  • Chinese-English translation at volume
  • Cost-sensitive multilingual content generation
  • Localization workflows with budget constraints
  • Short-form bilingual customer support

Strengths

The pricing undercuts most general-purpose models by 60-80%, making it viable for high-throughput translation pipelines where per-token costs dominate. The 30B parameter count sits in a sweet spot for inference speed versus capability on focused tasks like translation. Tencent's internal training likely emphasizes Chinese language nuance given their market position, potentially offering better idiomatic handling than Western-trained models on Mandarin content.

Trade-offs

The 8K context window caps out below a typical research paper or legal contract, forcing chunking strategies that can break coherence in long documents. Without public benchmark scores on MMLU, HumanEval, or translation-specific tests like WMT, you're flying blind on how it stacks up against Llama 3.1 70B or GPT-4o mini. The proprietary license and Tencent hosting may raise data residency concerns for regulated industries.

Specifications

Provider
tencent
Category
llm
Context length
8,192 tokens
Max output
4,096 tokens
Modalities
text
License
proprietary
Released
2026-08-20

Pricing

Input
$0.07/Mtok
Output
$0.29/Mtok
Model ID
tencent/hy-mt2-30b-a3b

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
$2.47
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
tencent8k$0.07/Mtok$0.29/Mtok———

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Projects have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Projects per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Product Description Translation

Translate this product description to Simplified Chinese for a mainland China audience. Maintain the enthusiastic tone but adapt idioms to feel natural: [paste English text]

Customer Email Localization

Translate this customer service email from Chinese to English. Keep the polite, formal register appropriate for business correspondence: [paste Chinese text]

Batch Subtitle Generation

Convert these English video subtitles to Chinese. Keep each line under 42 characters for readability and match the timing cues: [paste subtitle file]

Bilingual FAQ Drafting

Write a FAQ answer in both English and Simplified Chinese explaining [topic]. Make sure technical terms are consistent across both versions.

Quick Sentiment Check

Read this Chinese product review and tell me if the sentiment is positive, negative, or mixed. Explain which phrases signal the sentiment: [paste review]

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Translate this product description into French, German, and Spanish while preserving the marketing tone: 'Our new wireless earbuds deliver crystal-clear sound with 24-hour battery life and seamless device switching.'

Output

**French:** Nos nouveaux écouteurs sans fil offrent un son d'une clarté cristalline avec une autonomie de 24 heures et un changement d'appareil transparent. **German:** Unsere neuen kabellosen Ohrhörer liefern kristallklaren Sound mit 24 Stunden Akkulaufzeit und nahtlosem Gerätewechsel. **Spanish:** Nuestros nuevos auriculares inalámbricos ofrecen un sonido nítido como el cristal con 24 horas de duración de batería y cambio fluido entre dispositivos. All three translations maintain the aspirational marketing register while adapting idiomatically to each target language.

Notes

This example highlights Hy-MT2's core strength: multilingual translation with tone preservation. The model handles commercial copy well across European languages. However, the 8K context window limits batch translation jobs — you'll need to chunk larger catalogs or documentation sets.

Prompt

I have customer feedback in Mandarin: '这个功能很难用,界面太复杂了。' Translate to English and suggest three specific UI improvements based on the complaint.

Output

**Translation:** 'This feature is difficult to use, the interface is too complicated.' **Suggested improvements:** 1. Reduce the number of visible options on the main screen by moving advanced settings into a collapsible menu 2. Add tooltips or inline help text for technical terms that may confuse non-expert users 3. Implement a simplified 'Quick Mode' toggle that presents only the three most common actions These changes address the core usability concern while maintaining feature depth for advanced users.

Notes

Demonstrates Hy-MT2's ability to translate and reason across languages in a single pass. The model connects Chinese user feedback to actionable English recommendations. At $0.29/Mtok output, this is cost-effective for support ticket workflows, though responses lack the depth of frontier reasoning models.

Prompt

Localize this error message for Japanese mobile users, keeping it under 40 characters: 'Connection timeout. Check your network settings and try again.'

Output

**Japanese localization:** 接続タイムアウト。ネットワーク設定を確認して再試行してください。 **Character count:** 34 characters (within the 40-character constraint) **Cultural adaptation notes:** Japanese mobile users expect polite, concise error messages. This version uses standard technical terminology (タイムアウト for 'timeout') that's widely understood, while maintaining the helpful two-step instruction format common in Japanese UX patterns.

Notes

Shows Hy-MT2's strength in constrained localization tasks with cultural awareness. The model respects character limits while adapting tone appropriately. The 8K context window is sufficient for UI string batches, making this practical for app localization sprints where you're translating dozens of short strings at once.

Use-case deep-dives

High-frequency customer support routing

When Hy-MT2-30B-A3B makes sense for support ticket classification at scale

A 12-person e-commerce support team handling 800+ tickets daily needs fast intent classification to route inquiries to the right specialist. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B hits the price point that matters here: $0.07 input means classifying a 200-token ticket costs $0.000014, versus $0.0001+ on comparable 30B models. At 800 tickets/day that's $4/month instead of $30+. The 8K context window covers ticket history plus knowledge base snippets for better routing decisions. Trade-off: no public benchmarks means you're flying blind on accuracy until you test it against your labeled data. If classification errors cost you more than the $26/month you'd save over a proven alternative, pay up for the benchmarked model. Otherwise run a two-week A/B test and let the numbers decide.

Multilingual product description expansion

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for cross-border catalog generation on a tight budget

A 4-person Shopify agency manages 15 cross-border stores and needs to turn 50-word English descriptions into 150-word localized versions across 8 languages. The model name suggests multilingual translation focus (MT likely = machine translation), and at $0.29/Mtok output, generating 150 words per product costs $0.0011 versus $0.006+ on GPT-4-class models. Processing 200 products weekly across 8 languages runs $176/month here instead of $960+. The 8K window handles product specs, brand voice guidelines, and SEO keywords in one pass. Caveat: without BLEU or COMET scores you can't verify translation quality upfront. If a bad translation torpedoes a product launch, the savings evaporate. Test on 20 non-critical SKUs first, get native speaker review, then scale if quality holds.

Internal documentation summarization

When to use Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for recurring Confluence digest generation

A 30-person engineering org wants daily summaries of updated Confluence pages sent to Slack—typically 15 pages/day averaging 2K tokens each. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B processes 30K input tokens and generates 500-word summaries (650 tokens output) for $2.29/day versus $9+ on frontier models. That's $50/month instead of $200+ for a background task where perfect accuracy isn't life-or-death. The 8K context fits most single-page summarization; multi-page synthesis needs chunking. The risk: no MMLU or summarization benchmarks means you might get meandering or hallucinated summaries. Run it for a week with human spot-checks on 3 random summaries daily. If quality stays above 80% useful, the cost savings justify the occasional re-run. If it dips below 70%, switch to a model with proven abstractive summarization scores.

Frequently asked

Is Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B good for general text generation?

It's a 30B parameter model with standard text capabilities, but without public benchmarks we can't verify its performance against alternatives. The 8K context window is limiting for longer documents. If you need proven quality, GPT-4o-mini or Claude Haiku offer better documented performance at similar or lower cost.

Is Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B cheaper than GPT-4o-mini?

Yes on input ($0.07 vs $0.15 per Mtok), but output costs $0.29 versus GPT-4o-mini's $0.60. For typical workloads with 3:1 output-to-input ratios, Hy-MT2 runs about 40% cheaper. However, GPT-4o-mini has proven quality and 128K context, making the price difference less meaningful for most production use.

Can Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B handle long documents?

No. The 8,192 token context window caps out around 6,000 words total for input and output combined. This makes it unsuitable for document analysis, long-form content generation, or multi-turn conversations with history. For documents over 5 pages, use Claude Sonnet (200K) or Gemini 1.5 Pro (2M context).

How does Hy-MT2-30B-A3B compare to other Tencent models?

Tencent hasn't published comparative benchmarks between their model variants, so we can't make evidence-based claims about relative performance. The 30B parameter count suggests mid-tier capability, but without MMLU, HumanEval, or other standard scores, you're deploying blind. Request benchmark data from Tencent before committing production workloads.

Should I use Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for a production chatbot?

Not recommended without extensive testing. The lack of public benchmarks means unknown quality on reasoning, instruction-following, and safety. The 8K context limits conversation history to roughly 15-20 exchanges. For production chat, Claude Haiku or GPT-4o-mini offer documented performance, better context, and established safety guardrails at comparable cost.

Compare with

More language models

See all language models →

Data last verified 14 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.