Tencent: Hy3 preview
Hy3 preview is a high-efficiency Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent designed for agentic workflows and production use. It supports configurable reasoning levels across disabled, low, and high modes, allowing it to...
Anyone in the Project can @-mention Tencent: Hy3 preview with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Budget-conscious long document analysis
- Chinese-language processing tasks
- High-volume batch operations
- Early testing of emerging models
Strengths
The 262K context window handles full-length books or extensive codebases in a single pass, while the $0.18/$0.60 per Mtok pricing undercuts most Western competitors by 60-80%. Tencent's infrastructure suggests strong Chinese-language capabilities, making this a natural fit for bilingual workflows or Asia-Pacific deployments. The preview status means you get early access to capabilities that may improve rapidly as the model matures.
Trade-offs
No public benchmarks means you're flying blind on accuracy, reasoning depth, and instruction-following compared to GPT-4o or Claude. Preview status implies potential instability, rate limits, or breaking changes as Tencent iterates. English-language performance is unproven—if your workload skews heavily Western, you may hit quality gaps that cheaper pricing can't offset. The lack of multimodal support limits use cases to pure text.
Specifications
- Provider
- tencent
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 262,144 tokens
- Max output
- 235,929 tokens
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2026-04-22
Pricing
- Input
- $0.18/Mtok
- Output
- $0.60/Mtok
- Model ID
tencent/hy3-preview
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tencent | 262k | $0.18/Mtok | $0.60/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Long Document Summary
Summarize the key findings, methodology, and conclusions from this research paper. Focus on technical details and highlight any limitations the authors mention.
Bilingual Translation Check
Translate this Chinese business document to English, preserving technical terminology and formal tone. Flag any phrases that don't translate cleanly.
Codebase Analysis
Review these Python modules for security vulnerabilities, code duplication, and architectural issues. Suggest specific refactorings with line references.
Batch Data Extraction
Extract company name, contact email, and industry sector from each entry in this list. Return results as a JSON array with consistent field names.
Meeting Notes Synthesis
Read these three meeting transcripts and create a unified action item list. Group by owner, include deadlines, and note any conflicting decisions.
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Review this Python function for potential race conditions in a multi-threaded environment. Focus on the shared state access pattern and suggest thread-safe alternatives.
The function accesses `self.cache` without synchronization, creating a classic check-then-act race condition. Between lines 12-14, two threads could simultaneously detect a cache miss and both initiate expensive computations. Consider wrapping the lookup and update in a threading.Lock() context manager, or use a thread-safe collections.OrderedDict with a custom __missing__ method. For high-concurrency scenarios, evaluate whether threading.RLock() is needed if the cache update itself calls methods that re-enter the lock. The current implementation will produce duplicate work under load, not data corruption, so severity depends on computation cost.
With 262K token context, Hy3 can analyze entire codebases for concurrency issues across multiple files. This example shows its ability to identify subtle threading problems and provide graduated solutions. The 3.3× output pricing premium means you'll want to constrain response length for routine code reviews.
Summarize the key regulatory changes in this 47-page EU AI Act compliance document, then draft three specific action items our legal team should prioritize this quarter.
The document introduces mandatory conformity assessments for high-risk AI systems (Article 43), expands transparency obligations for general-purpose models exceeding 10^25 FLOPs (Article 52b), and establishes a 24-month grace period for existing systems. Your legal team should: (1) Conduct risk classification audits for all customer-facing AI features by end-Q2, documenting which fall under Annex III categories. (2) Draft template transparency disclosures for model cards, ensuring technical documentation meets Article 13 requirements before the August implementation deadline. (3) Establish a vendor assessment process for third-party AI components, as liability chains now extend to deployers under Article 61. The grace period expires November 2025.
The 262K context window handles lengthy regulatory documents without truncation, a practical advantage over 128K models when processing legal or technical specifications. Hy3's structured output here balances comprehension with actionable recommendations, though you'll need domain expertise to validate legal interpretations.
I'm debugging a customer report where our React app freezes for 3-4 seconds on initial load, but only on Samsung devices running Android 12. Walk me through a systematic troubleshooting approach.
Start with Samsung-specific rendering pipeline differences: enable Chrome DevTools remote debugging and record a performance profile during the freeze. Samsung's OneUI browser applies aggressive layout throttling on Android 12 that can stall React's initial hydration if you're server-rendering large component trees. Check if `useLayoutEffect` hooks are blocking—Samsung's implementation waits for all layout effects before first paint. Verify your bundle isn't triggering Samsung's memory-pressure heuristics (they're more conservative than Pixel devices). Inspect whether any third-party libraries use `navigator.userAgent` checks that fail on Samsung's modified WebView. If the freeze correlates with network requests, Samsung Android 12 has a known bug with HTTP/2 multiplexing that causes 3-second stalls when >6 streams open simultaneously. Test with HTTP/1.1 fallback as a diagnostic step.
This troubleshooting response demonstrates Hy3's ability to synthesize platform-specific knowledge with debugging methodology. The model connects device-level quirks to React internals, showing practical engineering reasoning. At $0.60/Mtok output, verbose diagnostic walkthroughs like this cost more than terse models, so consider prompt engineering to request concise initial responses with follow-up depth.
Use-case deep-dives
When 262k context beats splitting contracts across calls
A 4-person legal ops team needs to compare master service agreements against 30+ vendor contracts every quarter. Tencent Hy3 preview handles this in one call: its 262,144-token window fits roughly 200,000 words, enough for 8-12 full contracts plus the MSA template. At $0.18/Mtok input, loading 150k tokens costs $0.027 per comparison run—cheaper than chaining smaller models and debugging context-loss errors across multiple calls. The trade-off: $0.60/Mtok output makes this expensive if you're generating long summaries instead of structured diffs. If your output stays under 5k tokens per run (a JSON change-log or red-flag list), Hy3 preview wins on both cost and accuracy. For teams running 40+ comparisons/month, the context advantage pays for itself in time saved.
Why Hy3 preview works for batch log parsing at scale
A 10-person SRE team processes 500MB of application logs nightly to flag anomalies before standup. Hy3 preview's 262k-token context lets them batch 6-8 hours of logs into a single prompt instead of chunking by service or time window. Input cost runs $0.90 per night (5M tokens at $0.18/Mtok), and the model returns a 2k-token incident summary at $0.0012 output cost. No public benchmarks exist yet, so this is a preview-stage bet: if accuracy holds against GPT-4 class models on structured extraction, the price and context combination beats alternatives by 40%. The risk: without MMLU or HumanEval scores, you're flying blind on reasoning quality. Run a two-week parallel test against your current model before cutting over production workflows.
Hy3 preview for Chinese-market support teams under budget
A 15-person e-commerce support team in Shenzhen handles 200 Chinese-language tickets daily, mixing product questions with return-policy edge cases. Tencent models historically outperform Western LLMs on Chinese-language nuance, and Hy3 preview's $0.18 input pricing undercuts GPT-4o by 67% when most of the token load is incoming ticket history. Each ticket averages 1,200 input tokens (prior messages) and 400 output tokens (draft response), costing $0.00046 per ticket or $92/month at 200/day volume. The context window supports multi-turn conversations without truncation. The catch: no English-language benchmarks and preview-tier stability mean this works best for teams already committed to Tencent's ecosystem. If you're bilingual or US-based, wait for production release and public evals.
Frequently asked
Is Tencent Hy3 preview good for general text tasks?
Hy3 preview handles standard text generation, summarization, and analysis competently, but without public benchmarks it's hard to gauge performance against GPT-4 or Claude. The 262k context window makes it viable for long-document work. If you need proven performance metrics for production, wait for benchmark data or test thoroughly before committing.
Is Tencent Hy3 cheaper than GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet?
Yes, significantly. At $0.18 input and $0.60 output per million tokens, Hy3 costs roughly 85% less than GPT-4o ($2.50/$10.00) and 70% less than Claude Sonnet 3.5 ($3.00/$15.00). For high-volume applications where cost matters more than cutting-edge reasoning, Hy3's pricing is competitive with mid-tier models like Gemini Flash.
Can Hy3 handle 262k token contexts reliably?
The advertised 262k window is large enough for entire codebases or 200-page documents, but real-world performance at max context is untested publicly. Tencent models historically perform better with Chinese text, so expect degradation with English-heavy inputs near the limit. Test your specific use case before assuming full-window reliability.
How does Hy3 preview compare to previous Tencent models?
No public data exists comparing Hy3 to earlier Tencent releases like Hunyuan. The "preview" label suggests this is pre-release, so expect API changes and performance tuning. If you're already using Tencent models, Hy3's larger context window is the main upgrade, but wait for stable release before migrating production workloads.
Should I use Hy3 for customer-facing chatbots?
Only if you're comfortable with preview-stage reliability and can handle potential API instability. The low pricing makes it attractive for high-volume chat, but without latency benchmarks or uptime guarantees, you're taking a risk. For customer-facing work, stick with GPT-4o-mini or Claude Haiku until Hy3 exits preview.
Compare with
More language models
- Tencent: Hy4 previewtencent
- Tencent: Hy-MT2-1.8Btencent
- Tencent: Hy-MT2-30B-A3Btencent
- Tencent: Hy-MT2-7Btencent
- TheDrummer: Cydonia 24B V4.1thedrummer
- TheDrummer: Skyfall 36B V2thedrummer
- TheDrummer: UnslopNemo 12Bthedrummer
- Thinking Machines: Inklingthinkingmachines
- Thinking Machines: Inkling (free)thinkingmachines
- Thinking Machines: Inkling Smallthinkingmachines
- Thinking Machines: Inkling Small (free)thinkingmachines
- TypeSafe: Jev Routertypesafe