NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...
Anyone in the Project can @-mention NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Long-context document ingestion under budget
- Large codebase analysis with cost constraints
- High-volume text processing pipelines
- Internal knowledge base summarization
Strengths
The 202K context window handles entire codebases or multi-document sets in a single call. At $0.60 per million input tokens, it undercuts most competitors by 40-60% for long-context work. NVIDIA's GPU infrastructure typically delivers low-latency responses even with large prompts. The pricing structure favors read-heavy workloads where you send large contexts but need concise outputs.
Trade-offs
No public benchmark data means you can't compare reasoning quality, instruction-following, or coding accuracy against Claude, GPT-4, or Gemini before committing. NVIDIA hasn't published MMLU, HumanEval, or other standard scores. You'll need to run your own evals on representative tasks. The model is proprietary with no local deployment option, so you're locked into NVIDIA's API and pricing changes.
Specifications
- Provider
- nvidia
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 202,800 tokens
- Max output
- 182,520 tokens
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2026-06-04
Pricing
- Input
- $0.60/Mtok
- Output
- $2.40/Mtok
- Model ID
nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nvidia | 203k | $0.60/Mtok | $2.40/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Codebase Architecture Summary
Review this codebase and produce a 500-word architecture summary covering: main modules, data flow between components, external dependencies, and any obvious technical debt. Focus on how the pieces connect.
Multi-Document Policy Extraction
Extract all data retention policies, SLA commitments, and liability clauses from these documents. Present them in a comparison table with document name, clause text, and page reference.
Long Transcript Thematic Analysis
Identify the top 5 recurring themes across these meeting transcripts. For each theme, list the meetings where it appeared, key quotes, and any decisions or action items tied to it.
Research Paper Literature Review
Summarize the methodology and key findings from each paper, then identify areas of consensus, contradiction, and gaps in the research. Organize by research question addressed.
Cost-Optimized Content Moderation
Review these user posts for policy violations: hate speech, spam, personal information disclosure, or off-topic content. Flag each violation with post ID, violation type, and a one-sentence explanation.
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Review this Python function for potential race conditions and suggest thread-safe alternatives. Focus on the shared state access pattern.
The function modifies `self.cache` without synchronization, creating a classic read-modify-write race. If two threads call this simultaneously, both might read the same stale value, increment it independently, and write back—losing one update. Replace the dictionary with `threading.Lock()` around the critical section, or better yet, use `collections.Counter` with a lock, or switch to `multiprocessing.Manager().dict()` if you need cross-process safety. The current pattern will corrupt state under concurrent load.
Nemotron 3 Ultra's 202k context window allows it to analyze entire codebases in one pass, making it effective for architectural code review. This example shows its strength in identifying concurrency bugs and proposing idiomatic Python solutions. The output is direct and actionable, though the model occasionally over-explains basic concepts when brevity would serve better.
Summarize the key regulatory changes in this 50-page SEC filing that would affect our Q3 compliance roadmap. Prioritize items requiring engineering work.
Three changes demand engineering attention: (1) New data retention rules (Section 4.2) require audit logs kept for 7 years, up from 3—your current S3 lifecycle policy expires at 5 years. (2) The amended disclosure requirements (Section 6.1) now mandate real-time reporting of certain transactions within 15 minutes, not end-of-day. (3) Section 9.3 introduces stricter PII handling for California residents, which conflicts with your existing anonymization pipeline's 24-hour batch window. Items 1 and 3 need infrastructure changes; item 2 likely requires a new event streaming layer.
The 202k token context window is the standout feature here—Nemotron 3 Ultra can ingest lengthy regulatory documents and extract engineering-relevant details without summarization loss. This example demonstrates strong information filtering and prioritization. However, at $2.40/Mtok output, processing many long documents daily becomes expensive compared to models with similar context capacity.
Generate a customer support response for a user reporting that our mobile app crashes on launch after the latest iOS update. They've already tried reinstalling.
Thanks for reporting this and for trying a reinstall. We're seeing similar reports from iOS 17.4 users—it appears to be a conflict with our background sync service and the new iOS privacy framework. Our team pushed a fix to the App Store this morning (version 3.2.1), which should be available within the next few hours. In the meantime, you can work around it by disabling Background App Refresh for our app in Settings > General > Background App Refresh. That will stop the crash, though you'll need to manually open the app to sync. We'll follow up once the update is live.
This example highlights Nemotron 3 Ultra's ability to generate empathetic, technically accurate support content. The response balances user-friendliness with technical precision—acknowledging the issue, providing a workaround, and setting expectations. The model's training appears strong in customer-facing communication, though it lacks the real-time knowledge to reference actual version numbers or current iOS releases without that context in the prompt.
Use-case deep-dives
When 200k context wins on cross-referencing 40+ depositions
A 4-person litigation support team needs to cross-reference witness statements across 40+ deposition transcripts totaling 180k tokens per case batch. Nemotron 3 Ultra's 202k context window handles the full set in one prompt without chunking or retrieval overhead, letting you ask "which witnesses contradict the timeline in exhibit 12" and get answers that span the entire record. At $0.60 input per million tokens, loading 180k tokens costs $0.11 per query—cheap enough to run exploratory questions without budget anxiety. The $2.40 output rate only matters if you're generating long summaries; most discovery queries return under 1k tokens. If your case files exceed 200k tokens regularly, you'll need a chunking strategy anyway, but for the 70% that fit, this is the simplest path to whole-case reasoning.
Why 200k context beats retrieval for full-quarter analyst prep
An 8-person investor relations team prepares board decks by analyzing 12 weeks of earnings calls, analyst questions, and management commentary—roughly 150k tokens per quarter. Nemotron 3 Ultra loads the entire quarter in context and answers "how did guidance language shift between May and July" without a vector database or multi-step retrieval. The $0.60 input cost means $0.09 to load a full quarter, and you can run 20+ analytical queries for under $2 total. Output pricing at $2.40/Mtok is higher than some alternatives, but most IR queries return 500-800 token summaries, so the delta is negligible. If you're generating 10k+ token reports per query, consider a cheaper output model; otherwise, the context advantage justifies the premium for quarterly cadence work.
When Nemotron 3 Ultra is overkill for high-frequency triage
A 12-person SaaS support team routes 300 tickets daily, each 200-400 tokens, using AI to assign priority and department. Nemotron 3 Ultra's 200k context is wasted here—you're never loading more than 1k tokens per ticket, and the $2.40 output rate stacks up fast at volume. At 300 tickets/day with 150-token responses, you're spending $108/day on output alone ($2.40 × 0.045 Mtok × 300), versus $27/day on a $0.60 output model. The context window advantage doesn't apply to single-ticket triage, and there are no public benchmarks to justify the premium for classification accuracy. Use a cheaper, faster model for this scenario unless you're batching 50+ related tickets into one context for pattern analysis—then the 200k window starts to pay off.
Frequently asked
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra good for long document analysis?
Yes, with a 202,800-token context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra handles entire codebases, legal documents, or research papers in a single prompt. That's roughly 150,000 words—enough for most enterprise document workflows without chunking. The lack of public benchmarks means you'll want to test it on your specific use case before committing.
Is Nemotron 3 Ultra cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo?
Yes, significantly. At $0.60 input and $2.40 output per million tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra costs about 60% less than GPT-4 Turbo for typical workloads. If you're processing large documents where input tokens dominate, the savings are even steeper. The trade-off is zero public benchmark data to validate quality.
Can Nemotron 3 Ultra handle 200k tokens without degradation?
The 202,800-token window suggests it's designed for full-context retrieval, but without published needle-in-haystack or long-context benchmarks, performance at max capacity is unverified. NVIDIA typically optimizes for enterprise inference, so latency and accuracy at scale should be solid, but test with your data first.
How does Nemotron 3 Ultra compare to Llama 3.1 405B?
Nemotron 3 Ultra's context window is 4x larger than Llama 3.1's 128k, making it better for document-heavy tasks. Pricing is competitive if you're using NVIDIA's hosted API. However, Llama 3.1 has extensive public benchmarks proving its reasoning and coding ability, while Nemotron 3 has none. Choose Llama if you need proven performance.
Should I use Nemotron 3 Ultra for production chatbots?
Only if you need the massive context window for session history or retrieval. The $2.40 output price is reasonable for chat, but the absence of public benchmarks means you're flying blind on conversational quality, instruction-following, and safety. Run a pilot with real user queries before scaling.
Compare with
More language models
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra (free)nvidia
- NVIDIA: Switchyardnvidia
- OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turboopenai
- OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kopenai
- OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)openai
- OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo Instructopenai
- OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)openai
- OpenAI: GPT-4openai
- OpenAI: GPT-4.1openai
- OpenAI: GPT-4.1 (batch)openai
- OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Miniopenai
- OpenAI: GPT-4.1 Mini (batch)openai