NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2 VL is a 12-billion-parameter open multimodal reasoning model designed for video understanding and document intelligence. It introduces a hybrid Transformer-Mamba architecture, combining transformer-level accuracy with Mamba’s...
Anyone in the Space can @-mention NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Space, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Prototyping multimodal applications at zero cost
- Video frame analysis and summarization
- Screenshot understanding and UI extraction
- Image captioning for content pipelines
- Cost-sensitive vision tasks in production
Strengths
The 128K context window handles long video sequences or multi-page document scans in a single call. Free pricing removes friction for experimentation and high-volume inference where accuracy requirements are moderate. NVIDIA's optimization for their own hardware means fast response times compared to similarly-sized open models. The multimodal architecture processes images and video natively rather than through separate encoders, which simplifies integration for teams already using NVIDIA infrastructure.
Trade-offs
At 12B parameters this model lacks the reasoning depth of frontier multimodal systems like GPT-4V or Claude 3.5 Sonnet for complex visual question answering. Proprietary licensing means you cannot self-host or fine-tune, limiting control over deployment. Without published benchmarks we cannot verify performance against MMMU, MathVista, or other standard vision-language evaluations. The free tier likely includes rate limits that will constrain production workloads, though NVIDIA has not published specific quotas.
Specifications
- Provider
- nvidia
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 128,000 tokens
- Max output
- 128,000 tokens
- Modalities
- image, text, video
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2025-10-28
Pricing
- Input
- $0.00/Mtok
- Output
- $0.00/Mtok
- Model ID
nvidia/nemotron-nano-12b-v2-vl:free
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nvidia | 128k | $0.00/Mtok | $0.00/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Extract UI Components
Analyze this screenshot and list all interactive UI components you see. For each component, describe its type (button, input field, dropdown, etc.), its label or placeholder text, and its approximate position on the screen.Open in a Space →
Summarize Video Content
I'm providing frames from a tutorial video. Watch the progression and create a bulleted summary of the main topics covered, noting any on-screen text or diagrams that appear. Focus on actionable steps demonstrated.Open in a Space →
Caption Product Images
Write a detailed product description for this image. Include the item type, visible colors and materials, notable features or design elements, and suggested use cases. Keep it under 100 words and optimized for search.Open in a Space →
Analyze Chart Data
This image contains a chart or graph. Describe what type of visualization it is, identify the axes and their units, extract the key data points or trends shown, and summarize the main insight in one sentence.Open in a Space →
Compare Image Pairs
Compare these two images and list all visible differences between them. Focus on changes to text, layout, colors, or objects. Organize your findings as a numbered list with specific locations noted.Open in a Space →
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Analyze this product photo and suggest three specific improvements to the lighting and composition that would increase conversion rates for an e-commerce listing.
The current setup shows harsh overhead lighting creating unflattering shadows under the product's rim. First, add a diffused key light at 45 degrees to soften those shadows and reveal texture detail. Second, the composition places the product dead-center—shift it slightly right using the rule of thirds to create visual interest. Third, the background is competing for attention; switch to a neutral gray backdrop (18% gray card works) to make the product pop. The existing shot also crops too tight at the base—pull back 15% to give the product breathing room and suggest scale.
This example demonstrates the model's visual reasoning across image understanding and practical domain knowledge. With a 128K context window, it can process high-resolution product images alongside brand guidelines. The free pricing makes it accessible for batch analysis of entire catalogs, though the lack of public benchmarks means output quality should be validated against your specific use case before production deployment.
I'm reviewing security camera footage from 2-5 PM yesterday. Summarize any unusual activity patterns and flag timestamps where someone approaches the loading dock entrance.
Reviewing the three-hour video segment: Normal delivery traffic until 14:23, when a white panel van (no visible markings) parks for 47 seconds without unloading—driver remains in vehicle. At 15:41, two individuals approach the loading dock from the east fence line rather than the main driveway, pause for 18 seconds near the door, then continue toward the parking lot. Standard UPS delivery at 16:12. At 16:38, the unmarked van returns, parks in the same spot for 2 minutes before departing. Flagged timestamps: 14:23, 15:41, 16:38. The east-fence approach and repeated unmarked vehicle visits deviate from your typical weekday pattern.
Showcases video understanding across extended footage—the 128K context window allows processing longer surveillance clips in a single pass without chunking. The model identifies temporal patterns and spatial anomalies, useful for security review workflows. However, without published accuracy benchmarks, critical security decisions should include human verification of flagged segments rather than relying solely on model output.
Extract all medication names, dosages, and administration schedules from these three prescription images, then format as a structured table for our pharmacy management system.
| Medication | Dosage | Schedule | Duration | |------------|--------|----------|----------| | Lisinopril | 10mg | Once daily, morning | 90 days | | Metformin HCL | 500mg | Twice daily with meals | 90 days | | Atorvastatin | 20mg | Once daily, evening | 90 days | Additional notes from prescriptions: Lisinopril refills remaining: 2. Metformin shows prescriber instruction 'take with food to minimize GI effects'. Atorvastatin prescription dated most recent (Jan 15, 2025), others from Dec 2024. All three prescriptions from Dr. Sarah Chen, NPI visible on images.
Highlights multi-image document understanding with structured data extraction—a common workflow in healthcare administration. The model processes visual text across multiple prescription formats and normalizes into a consistent schema. The 128K token context handles batch processing of patient records. Free pricing removes cost barriers for high-volume medical document workflows, though OCR accuracy on handwritten notes or degraded faxes should be spot-checked given the absence of published medical-document benchmarks.
Use-case deep-dives
When free multimodal inference lets you ship faster than budget approval
A 4-person dev shop building a visual search feature for a retail client needs to process 2,000 product images daily during the prototype phase. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL is the right call here because $0.00/Mtok means you can run the entire proof-of-concept without waiting on budget sign-off or credit card limits. The 128K context window handles batch processing of multiple images in a single request, cutting integration overhead. You're trading benchmark certainty (no public scores yet) for deployment speed, which matters when the client wants a working demo in two weeks. If accuracy falls short during testing, you've lost time but zero dollars—switch to a paid vision model only after validating the workflow. Use this for any multimodal MVP where iteration speed beats precision in month one.
Free video analysis for high-volume moderation with human review fallback
A 12-person community platform processes 800 user-uploaded videos daily and needs first-pass flagging before human moderators review edge cases. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL works because video modality support is rare at $0.00/Mtok, and you can afford to over-flag (30% false positive rate) since humans catch the mistakes downstream. The 128K context lets you analyze longer clips without chunking, reducing API calls and simplifying your pipeline. Without public benchmarks, expect to tune your confidence thresholds during the first week—plan for a 10-15% manual review rate initially. If your moderation SLA requires sub-5% false negatives, budget for a paid model instead. Below 1,500 videos/day, the zero cost justifies the extra human QA time.
When zero-cost image+text search beats paying for OCR preprocessing
A 20-person consulting firm wants employees to query 4,000 scanned contracts and slide decks without building a separate OCR pipeline. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL handles this because it ingests images directly—you skip the $0.002/page Textract cost and the engineering overhead of a preprocessing step. The 128K context window means most documents fit in a single request, so retrieval stays simple. You're betting on acceptable accuracy without benchmark proof, which is fine for internal tooling where a 10-second manual lookup is the alternative. If query precision drops below 70% in your first 100 tests, fall back to a paid OCR+LLM stack. For read-only search where speed matters less than eliminating per-page costs, this is the default starting point.
Frequently asked
Is Nemotron Nano 12B good for multimodal tasks?
Yes, it handles image, text, and video inputs with a 128K context window, making it solid for document analysis, video understanding, and mixed-media workflows. At 12B parameters it won't match frontier models on complex reasoning, but for free inference it's a strong choice for prototyping multimodal applications or processing visual content at scale without cost constraints.
Is Nemotron Nano 12B actually free to use?
Yes, it's $0.00 per million tokens for both input and output through NVIDIA's API. This makes it ideal for high-volume experimentation, educational projects, or cost-sensitive production workloads where you need vision capabilities without burning budget. The trade-off is you're working with a smaller 12B model instead of a 70B+ alternative.
Can it handle 128K tokens of mixed image and text?
The 128K context window applies to the total token count, including image tokens. A single high-res image can consume 1K-4K tokens depending on encoding, so you'll fit roughly 30-100 images plus text in one request. For video, expect similar token consumption per frame. Plan your context budget accordingly when mixing modalities.
How does Nemotron Nano 12B compare to GPT-4V or Claude Sonnet?
It's significantly weaker on complex visual reasoning and instruction following—GPT-4V and Claude Sonnet are 10x+ larger and trained on more diverse data. Use Nemotron Nano when cost matters more than accuracy, like batch processing receipts or generating alt text. For nuanced image analysis or creative tasks, pay for the frontier models.
Should I use this for production vision APIs?
Only if your use case tolerates occasional errors and you need zero inference cost. It works for straightforward OCR, basic image classification, or video frame analysis where mistakes aren't critical. For customer-facing features requiring high accuracy—like medical imaging or legal document review—spend the money on GPT-4V, Claude, or Gemini instead.