LLMnvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free)

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2 VL is a 12-billion-parameter open multimodal reasoning model designed for video understanding and document intelligence. It introduces a hybrid Transformer-Mamba architecture, combining transformer-level accuracy with Mamba’s...

Anyone in the Space can @-mention NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL (free) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Space, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL is NVIDIA's compact multimodal model that handles text, images, and video at zero cost through their API. At 12B parameters it punches above its weight class for vision tasks while keeping inference fast enough for interactive applications. The free tier makes it ideal for prototyping multimodal workflows before committing to paid alternatives. Reach for this when you need vision capabilities without the GPT-4V price tag, but expect to upgrade for production-grade reasoning on complex documents or nuanced visual analysis.

Best for

  • Prototyping multimodal applications at zero cost
  • Video frame analysis and summarization
  • Screenshot understanding and UI extraction
  • Image captioning for content pipelines
  • Cost-sensitive vision tasks in production

Strengths

The 128K context window handles long video sequences or multi-page document scans in a single call. Free pricing removes friction for experimentation and high-volume inference where accuracy requirements are moderate. NVIDIA's optimization for their own hardware means fast response times compared to similarly-sized open models. The multimodal architecture processes images and video natively rather than through separate encoders, which simplifies integration for teams already using NVIDIA infrastructure.

Trade-offs

At 12B parameters this model lacks the reasoning depth of frontier multimodal systems like GPT-4V or Claude 3.5 Sonnet for complex visual question answering. Proprietary licensing means you cannot self-host or fine-tune, limiting control over deployment. Without published benchmarks we cannot verify performance against MMMU, MathVista, or other standard vision-language evaluations. The free tier likely includes rate limits that will constrain production workloads, though NVIDIA has not published specific quotas.

Specifications

Provider
nvidia
Category
llm
Context length
128,000 tokens
Max output
128,000 tokens
Modalities
image, text, video
License
proprietary
Released
2025-10-28

Pricing

Input
$0.00/Mtok
Output
$0.00/Mtok
Model ID
nvidia/nemotron-nano-12b-v2-vl:free

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
Freeno token cost
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
nvidia128k$0.00/Mtok$0.00/Mtok

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Spaces have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Spaces per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Extract UI Components

Analyze this screenshot and list all interactive UI components you see. For each component, describe its type (button, input field, dropdown, etc.), its label or placeholder text, and its approximate position on the screen.
Open in a Space →

Summarize Video Content

I'm providing frames from a tutorial video. Watch the progression and create a bulleted summary of the main topics covered, noting any on-screen text or diagrams that appear. Focus on actionable steps demonstrated.
Open in a Space →

Caption Product Images

Write a detailed product description for this image. Include the item type, visible colors and materials, notable features or design elements, and suggested use cases. Keep it under 100 words and optimized for search.
Open in a Space →

Analyze Chart Data

This image contains a chart or graph. Describe what type of visualization it is, identify the axes and their units, extract the key data points or trends shown, and summarize the main insight in one sentence.
Open in a Space →

Compare Image Pairs

Compare these two images and list all visible differences between them. Focus on changes to text, layout, colors, or objects. Organize your findings as a numbered list with specific locations noted.
Open in a Space →

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Analyze this product photo and suggest three specific improvements to the lighting and composition that would increase conversion rates for an e-commerce listing.

Output

The current setup shows harsh overhead lighting creating unflattering shadows under the product's rim. First, add a diffused key light at 45 degrees to soften those shadows and reveal texture detail. Second, the composition places the product dead-center—shift it slightly right using the rule of thirds to create visual interest. Third, the background is competing for attention; switch to a neutral gray backdrop (18% gray card works) to make the product pop. The existing shot also crops too tight at the base—pull back 15% to give the product breathing room and suggest scale.

Notes

This example demonstrates the model's visual reasoning across image understanding and practical domain knowledge. With a 128K context window, it can process high-resolution product images alongside brand guidelines. The free pricing makes it accessible for batch analysis of entire catalogs, though the lack of public benchmarks means output quality should be validated against your specific use case before production deployment.

Prompt

I'm reviewing security camera footage from 2-5 PM yesterday. Summarize any unusual activity patterns and flag timestamps where someone approaches the loading dock entrance.

Output

Reviewing the three-hour video segment: Normal delivery traffic until 14:23, when a white panel van (no visible markings) parks for 47 seconds without unloading—driver remains in vehicle. At 15:41, two individuals approach the loading dock from the east fence line rather than the main driveway, pause for 18 seconds near the door, then continue toward the parking lot. Standard UPS delivery at 16:12. At 16:38, the unmarked van returns, parks in the same spot for 2 minutes before departing. Flagged timestamps: 14:23, 15:41, 16:38. The east-fence approach and repeated unmarked vehicle visits deviate from your typical weekday pattern.

Notes

Showcases video understanding across extended footage—the 128K context window allows processing longer surveillance clips in a single pass without chunking. The model identifies temporal patterns and spatial anomalies, useful for security review workflows. However, without published accuracy benchmarks, critical security decisions should include human verification of flagged segments rather than relying solely on model output.

Prompt

Extract all medication names, dosages, and administration schedules from these three prescription images, then format as a structured table for our pharmacy management system.

Output

| Medication | Dosage | Schedule | Duration | |------------|--------|----------|----------| | Lisinopril | 10mg | Once daily, morning | 90 days | | Metformin HCL | 500mg | Twice daily with meals | 90 days | | Atorvastatin | 20mg | Once daily, evening | 90 days | Additional notes from prescriptions: Lisinopril refills remaining: 2. Metformin shows prescriber instruction 'take with food to minimize GI effects'. Atorvastatin prescription dated most recent (Jan 15, 2025), others from Dec 2024. All three prescriptions from Dr. Sarah Chen, NPI visible on images.

Notes

Highlights multi-image document understanding with structured data extraction—a common workflow in healthcare administration. The model processes visual text across multiple prescription formats and normalizes into a consistent schema. The 128K token context handles batch processing of patient records. Free pricing removes cost barriers for high-volume medical document workflows, though OCR accuracy on handwritten notes or degraded faxes should be spot-checked given the absence of published medical-document benchmarks.

Use-case deep-dives

Prototype visual search tools

When free multimodal inference lets you ship faster than budget approval

A 4-person dev shop building a visual search feature for a retail client needs to process 2,000 product images daily during the prototype phase. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL is the right call here because $0.00/Mtok means you can run the entire proof-of-concept without waiting on budget sign-off or credit card limits. The 128K context window handles batch processing of multiple images in a single request, cutting integration overhead. You're trading benchmark certainty (no public scores yet) for deployment speed, which matters when the client wants a working demo in two weeks. If accuracy falls short during testing, you've lost time but zero dollars—switch to a paid vision model only after validating the workflow. Use this for any multimodal MVP where iteration speed beats precision in month one.

Video content moderation queue

Free video analysis for high-volume moderation with human review fallback

A 12-person community platform processes 800 user-uploaded videos daily and needs first-pass flagging before human moderators review edge cases. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL works because video modality support is rare at $0.00/Mtok, and you can afford to over-flag (30% false positive rate) since humans catch the mistakes downstream. The 128K context lets you analyze longer clips without chunking, reducing API calls and simplifying your pipeline. Without public benchmarks, expect to tune your confidence thresholds during the first week—plan for a 10-15% manual review rate initially. If your moderation SLA requires sub-5% false negatives, budget for a paid model instead. Below 1,500 videos/day, the zero cost justifies the extra human QA time.

Internal document Q&A system

When zero-cost image+text search beats paying for OCR preprocessing

A 20-person consulting firm wants employees to query 4,000 scanned contracts and slide decks without building a separate OCR pipeline. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL handles this because it ingests images directly—you skip the $0.002/page Textract cost and the engineering overhead of a preprocessing step. The 128K context window means most documents fit in a single request, so retrieval stays simple. You're betting on acceptable accuracy without benchmark proof, which is fine for internal tooling where a 10-second manual lookup is the alternative. If query precision drops below 70% in your first 100 tests, fall back to a paid OCR+LLM stack. For read-only search where speed matters less than eliminating per-page costs, this is the default starting point.

Frequently asked

Is Nemotron Nano 12B good for multimodal tasks?

Yes, it handles image, text, and video inputs with a 128K context window, making it solid for document analysis, video understanding, and mixed-media workflows. At 12B parameters it won't match frontier models on complex reasoning, but for free inference it's a strong choice for prototyping multimodal applications or processing visual content at scale without cost constraints.

Is Nemotron Nano 12B actually free to use?

Yes, it's $0.00 per million tokens for both input and output through NVIDIA's API. This makes it ideal for high-volume experimentation, educational projects, or cost-sensitive production workloads where you need vision capabilities without burning budget. The trade-off is you're working with a smaller 12B model instead of a 70B+ alternative.

Can it handle 128K tokens of mixed image and text?

The 128K context window applies to the total token count, including image tokens. A single high-res image can consume 1K-4K tokens depending on encoding, so you'll fit roughly 30-100 images plus text in one request. For video, expect similar token consumption per frame. Plan your context budget accordingly when mixing modalities.

How does Nemotron Nano 12B compare to GPT-4V or Claude Sonnet?

It's significantly weaker on complex visual reasoning and instruction following—GPT-4V and Claude Sonnet are 10x+ larger and trained on more diverse data. Use Nemotron Nano when cost matters more than accuracy, like batch processing receipts or generating alt text. For nuanced image analysis or creative tasks, pay for the frontier models.

Should I use this for production vision APIs?

Only if your use case tolerates occasional errors and you need zero inference cost. It works for straightforward OCR, basic image classification, or video frame analysis where mistakes aren't critical. For customer-facing features requiring high accuracy—like medical imaging or legal document review—spend the money on GPT-4V, Claude, or Gemini instead.

Data last verified 8 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.