LLMnvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free)

NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is a large language model (LLM) trained from scratch by NVIDIA, and designed as a unified model for both reasoning and non-reasoning tasks. It responds to user queries and...

Anyone in the Space can @-mention NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.

All models

Starter is free forever - 1 Space, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.

Verdict

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is NVIDIA's compact instruction-tuned model optimized for on-device and edge deployment scenarios. With 9B parameters and a 128K context window, it targets developers who need local inference without API costs or latency. The free tier makes it ideal for prototyping and low-volume production workloads. Reach for this when you need a capable small model that runs locally or when API costs would otherwise constrain your use case.

Best for

  • On-device inference without API costs
  • Edge deployment with hardware constraints
  • Prototyping before scaling to larger models
  • Long-context tasks under 128K tokens
  • Privacy-sensitive local processing

Strengths

The 128K context window is unusually generous for a 9B parameter model, enabling document analysis and multi-turn conversations that would overflow smaller models. Zero API cost removes budget friction for experimentation and makes per-request economics predictable. The compact parameter count means faster inference on consumer hardware and lower memory requirements than 70B+ alternatives. NVIDIA's instruction tuning focuses on practical task completion rather than creative writing.

Trade-offs

Without public benchmark data, performance relative to Llama 3.2 8B or Gemma 2 9B remains unclear. The 9B parameter count will underperform frontier models on complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and specialized domain tasks. Proprietary licensing limits modification and redistribution compared to open-weight alternatives. Local deployment requires technical setup that API-first teams may find friction-heavy. Expect weaker performance on math, code generation, and multi-step logic compared to 70B+ models.

Specifications

Provider
nvidia
Category
llm
Context length
128,000 tokens
Max output
Modalities
text
License
proprietary
Released
2025-09-05

Pricing

Input
$0.00/Mtok
Output
$0.00/Mtok
Model ID
nvidia/nemotron-nano-9b-v2:free

Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Team cost calculator

Estimated monthly spend
Freeno token cost
17.6M tokens / month
5 seats · 80 msgs/day

Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.

Providers

ProviderContextInputOutputP50 latencyThroughput30d uptime
nvidia128k$0.00/Mtok$0.00/Mtok

Performance

Performance snapshots are collected daily. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Benchmarks

Public benchmark scores are not available yet for this model. Check back after the next ingestion run.

Works well with

Top MCPs

Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.

How Switchy teams use it

Not enough Spaces have used this model yet to share anonymised team stats. We wait for at least 50 distinct Spaces per week before publishing any aggregate.

Starter prompts

Summarize Long Documents

Read the following document and provide a 200-word summary highlighting the three most important findings and any recommended actions. Focus on factual accuracy over interpretation.
Open in a Space →

Extract Structured Data

Extract all people, organizations, dates, and locations from the text below. Return results as JSON with keys: people, organizations, dates, locations. Include confidence scores if uncertain.
Open in a Space →

Classify Support Tickets

Classify this support ticket into one of these categories: billing, technical, feature_request, account_access, other. Provide the category and a one-sentence justification.
Open in a Space →

Rewrite for Clarity

Rewrite the following text for a general audience with no technical background. Use simple sentences, avoid jargon, and maintain all key facts. Aim for 8th-grade reading level.
Open in a Space →

Generate Product Descriptions

Write a 75-word product description based on these specifications. Focus on benefits over features, use active voice, and include one call-to-action. Tone: professional but approachable.
Open in a Space →

Example outputs

Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.

Prompt

Review this Python function for potential bugs. It's supposed to merge two sorted lists but users report incorrect output when one list is empty.

Output

The function has a boundary condition bug. When either input list is empty, the while loop never executes, but the remaining elements from the non-empty list aren't appended to the result. Add these lines after the main loop: ```python result.extend(list1[i:]) result.extend(list2[j:]) ``` This ensures any remaining elements get included. The logic inside your loop looks correct for the merge operation itself—the comparison and pointer advancement work as expected for non-empty cases.

Notes

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 excels at focused code review tasks within its 128K context window, catching logic errors and suggesting precise fixes. The 9B parameter count means it stays practical for edge deployment while maintaining solid reasoning on common programming patterns, though it may miss more subtle architectural issues that larger models catch.

Prompt

Explain the difference between TCP and UDP to a junior developer who's building their first real-time multiplayer game.

Output

Think of TCP as certified mail—every packet is acknowledged, ordered, and guaranteed to arrive. If something gets lost, TCP resends it. Great for chat messages or loading game assets. UDP is like shouting across a room—fast, no guarantees. Packets might arrive out of order or not at all. For your game's player positions, you want UDP. If a position update drops, the next one (arriving 16ms later at 60fps) makes it irrelevant anyway. Waiting for TCP retransmission would cause visible lag. Use TCP for critical state (player joined, match ended). Use UDP for continuous data that expires quickly (positions, animations).

Notes

The model handles technical explanation with appropriate analogies and practical guidance. At 9B parameters, it balances accessibility with accuracy, making it suitable for documentation or educational content generation. The free tier and 128K context make it economical for processing large codebases or technical documents, though depth on cutting-edge protocols may be limited.

Prompt

Summarize this 50-page API specification document and create a quick-start guide with the 5 most common endpoints developers actually use. [document text follows]

Output

Based on the specification, here are the 5 endpoints that handle 80% of integration use cases: 1. **POST /auth/token** - Get your access token (required for all other calls) 2. **GET /users/me** - Fetch current user profile 3. **POST /items** - Create a new item (supports batch with array input) 4. **GET /items?filter=** - Search items (supports pagination via 'cursor' param) 5. **PATCH /items/{id}** - Update specific fields without replacing the whole object Authentication uses Bearer tokens (24-hour expiry). Rate limit is 1000 req/hour per token. All responses are JSON with consistent error schema at 4xx/5xx.

Notes

The 128K token context window is Nemotron Nano's standout feature for this use case—it can ingest entire API specs or documentation sets in one pass. The model identifies patterns and prioritizes information effectively, making it strong for technical summarization tasks. Being free removes cost barriers for documentation workflows, though extremely specialized domain knowledge may require fine-tuning.

Use-case deep-dives

High-volume customer support triage

Zero-cost ticket classification for bootstrapped support teams

A 4-person SaaS startup routing 300+ daily support emails needs instant category tagging without burning runway on API costs. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins here because it's free and the 128k context window handles full email threads plus your help center docs in a single prompt. You're trading benchmark ceiling for operational cost: at $0.00/Mtok, you can prototype aggressive classification rules, A/B test prompts, and scale to 1000+ tickets/day before considering paid alternatives. The model handles structured output well enough for routing decisions. If accuracy drops below 85% on your categories after two weeks of testing, step up to a paid 70B-class model—but most teams never hit that threshold.

Internal knowledge base Q&A

Free RAG backend for small-team documentation search

A 12-person engineering team wants Slack-based search across 50+ Notion pages and Google Docs without paying per-query fees. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is the right call: the 128k context fits your entire chunked knowledge base in retrieval context, and zero cost means unlimited employee queries. You're optimizing for coverage over precision—engineers will rephrase questions if the first answer misses, so 80% hit rate is fine. Self-host it on a single GPU instance or use a free-tier provider. The break-even is immediate: even 100 queries/day on a paid model costs $15-30/month, and your team will run 500+ once they trust it. If query volume crosses 2000/day or you need sub-second latency, migrate to a hosted paid option.

Batch content moderation

Overnight comment filtering for community platforms

A niche forum with 800 daily comments needs automated flagging for review without subscription costs. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 handles this: run it as a nightly batch job, feed each comment with your moderation guidelines in context, and flag anything the model scores above threshold. The 128k window means you can include 50+ example violations as few-shot context. You're not doing real-time moderation, so 5-10 second inference per comment is acceptable. At $0.00/Mtok, you process the entire day's comments for free. The trade-off: expect 10-15% false positives, so a human still reviews flagged content. If your community scales past 5000 comments/day or you need sub-second real-time checks, switch to a faster paid model with streaming support.

Frequently asked

Is Nemotron Nano 9B V2 good for coding tasks?

It handles basic coding reasonably well for a 9B parameter model, but don't expect GPT-4 level performance. Good for code completion, simple refactoring, and explaining snippets. For complex architecture decisions or debugging multi-file codebases, you'll want a larger model like Claude or GPT-4. The 128K context window helps with longer files.

Is Nemotron Nano 9B V2 actually free to use?

Yes, it's completely free through OpenRouter with $0 per million tokens for both input and output. This makes it ideal for high-volume applications, prototyping, or situations where cost matters more than peak performance. No hidden fees, no rate limits beyond OpenRouter's standard throttling.

Can it handle the full 128K context window reliably?

The 128K window is advertised, but smaller models often struggle with recall at maximum context. Expect solid performance up to 32-64K tokens. Beyond that, test your specific use case. For RAG applications or long document analysis, keep critical information in the first and last 20% of your prompt for best results.

How does Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compare to Llama 3.1 8B?

Both are similar-sized open models, but Nemotron offers a larger context window (128K vs 128K for Llama 3.1) and free inference. Llama 3.1 8B generally shows better reasoning on benchmarks. Choose Nemotron when cost is the priority and you need decent quality. Choose Llama when you need slightly better accuracy and can pay.

Should I use this for production chatbots?

Only if budget is your main constraint and user expectations are modest. It works for FAQ bots, simple customer service, or internal tools where occasional mistakes are acceptable. For customer-facing applications where quality matters, spend the money on Claude Haiku or GPT-4o mini instead. The free pricing makes experimentation risk-free, though.

Data last verified 8 hours ago.Sources aggregated hourly to weekly. See docs/architecture/model-directory.md.