NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free)
NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is a large language model (LLM) trained from scratch by NVIDIA, and designed as a unified model for both reasoning and non-reasoning tasks. It responds to user queries and...
Anyone in the Space can @-mention NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (free) with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Space, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- On-device inference without API costs
- Edge deployment with hardware constraints
- Prototyping before scaling to larger models
- Long-context tasks under 128K tokens
- Privacy-sensitive local processing
Strengths
The 128K context window is unusually generous for a 9B parameter model, enabling document analysis and multi-turn conversations that would overflow smaller models. Zero API cost removes budget friction for experimentation and makes per-request economics predictable. The compact parameter count means faster inference on consumer hardware and lower memory requirements than 70B+ alternatives. NVIDIA's instruction tuning focuses on practical task completion rather than creative writing.
Trade-offs
Without public benchmark data, performance relative to Llama 3.2 8B or Gemma 2 9B remains unclear. The 9B parameter count will underperform frontier models on complex reasoning, nuanced writing, and specialized domain tasks. Proprietary licensing limits modification and redistribution compared to open-weight alternatives. Local deployment requires technical setup that API-first teams may find friction-heavy. Expect weaker performance on math, code generation, and multi-step logic compared to 70B+ models.
Specifications
- Provider
- nvidia
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 128,000 tokens
- Max output
- —
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2025-09-05
Pricing
- Input
- $0.00/Mtok
- Output
- $0.00/Mtok
- Model ID
nvidia/nemotron-nano-9b-v2:free
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nvidia | 128k | $0.00/Mtok | $0.00/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Summarize Long Documents
Read the following document and provide a 200-word summary highlighting the three most important findings and any recommended actions. Focus on factual accuracy over interpretation.Open in a Space →
Extract Structured Data
Extract all people, organizations, dates, and locations from the text below. Return results as JSON with keys: people, organizations, dates, locations. Include confidence scores if uncertain.Open in a Space →
Classify Support Tickets
Classify this support ticket into one of these categories: billing, technical, feature_request, account_access, other. Provide the category and a one-sentence justification.Open in a Space →
Rewrite for Clarity
Rewrite the following text for a general audience with no technical background. Use simple sentences, avoid jargon, and maintain all key facts. Aim for 8th-grade reading level.Open in a Space →
Generate Product Descriptions
Write a 75-word product description based on these specifications. Focus on benefits over features, use active voice, and include one call-to-action. Tone: professional but approachable.Open in a Space →
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Review this Python function for potential bugs. It's supposed to merge two sorted lists but users report incorrect output when one list is empty.
The function has a boundary condition bug. When either input list is empty, the while loop never executes, but the remaining elements from the non-empty list aren't appended to the result. Add these lines after the main loop: ```python result.extend(list1[i:]) result.extend(list2[j:]) ``` This ensures any remaining elements get included. The logic inside your loop looks correct for the merge operation itself—the comparison and pointer advancement work as expected for non-empty cases.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 excels at focused code review tasks within its 128K context window, catching logic errors and suggesting precise fixes. The 9B parameter count means it stays practical for edge deployment while maintaining solid reasoning on common programming patterns, though it may miss more subtle architectural issues that larger models catch.
Explain the difference between TCP and UDP to a junior developer who's building their first real-time multiplayer game.
Think of TCP as certified mail—every packet is acknowledged, ordered, and guaranteed to arrive. If something gets lost, TCP resends it. Great for chat messages or loading game assets. UDP is like shouting across a room—fast, no guarantees. Packets might arrive out of order or not at all. For your game's player positions, you want UDP. If a position update drops, the next one (arriving 16ms later at 60fps) makes it irrelevant anyway. Waiting for TCP retransmission would cause visible lag. Use TCP for critical state (player joined, match ended). Use UDP for continuous data that expires quickly (positions, animations).
The model handles technical explanation with appropriate analogies and practical guidance. At 9B parameters, it balances accessibility with accuracy, making it suitable for documentation or educational content generation. The free tier and 128K context make it economical for processing large codebases or technical documents, though depth on cutting-edge protocols may be limited.
Summarize this 50-page API specification document and create a quick-start guide with the 5 most common endpoints developers actually use. [document text follows]
Based on the specification, here are the 5 endpoints that handle 80% of integration use cases: 1. **POST /auth/token** - Get your access token (required for all other calls) 2. **GET /users/me** - Fetch current user profile 3. **POST /items** - Create a new item (supports batch with array input) 4. **GET /items?filter=** - Search items (supports pagination via 'cursor' param) 5. **PATCH /items/{id}** - Update specific fields without replacing the whole object Authentication uses Bearer tokens (24-hour expiry). Rate limit is 1000 req/hour per token. All responses are JSON with consistent error schema at 4xx/5xx.
The 128K token context window is Nemotron Nano's standout feature for this use case—it can ingest entire API specs or documentation sets in one pass. The model identifies patterns and prioritizes information effectively, making it strong for technical summarization tasks. Being free removes cost barriers for documentation workflows, though extremely specialized domain knowledge may require fine-tuning.
Use-case deep-dives
Zero-cost ticket classification for bootstrapped support teams
A 4-person SaaS startup routing 300+ daily support emails needs instant category tagging without burning runway on API costs. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins here because it's free and the 128k context window handles full email threads plus your help center docs in a single prompt. You're trading benchmark ceiling for operational cost: at $0.00/Mtok, you can prototype aggressive classification rules, A/B test prompts, and scale to 1000+ tickets/day before considering paid alternatives. The model handles structured output well enough for routing decisions. If accuracy drops below 85% on your categories after two weeks of testing, step up to a paid 70B-class model—but most teams never hit that threshold.
Free RAG backend for small-team documentation search
A 12-person engineering team wants Slack-based search across 50+ Notion pages and Google Docs without paying per-query fees. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is the right call: the 128k context fits your entire chunked knowledge base in retrieval context, and zero cost means unlimited employee queries. You're optimizing for coverage over precision—engineers will rephrase questions if the first answer misses, so 80% hit rate is fine. Self-host it on a single GPU instance or use a free-tier provider. The break-even is immediate: even 100 queries/day on a paid model costs $15-30/month, and your team will run 500+ once they trust it. If query volume crosses 2000/day or you need sub-second latency, migrate to a hosted paid option.
Overnight comment filtering for community platforms
A niche forum with 800 daily comments needs automated flagging for review without subscription costs. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 handles this: run it as a nightly batch job, feed each comment with your moderation guidelines in context, and flag anything the model scores above threshold. The 128k window means you can include 50+ example violations as few-shot context. You're not doing real-time moderation, so 5-10 second inference per comment is acceptable. At $0.00/Mtok, you process the entire day's comments for free. The trade-off: expect 10-15% false positives, so a human still reviews flagged content. If your community scales past 5000 comments/day or you need sub-second real-time checks, switch to a faster paid model with streaming support.
Frequently asked
Is Nemotron Nano 9B V2 good for coding tasks?
It handles basic coding reasonably well for a 9B parameter model, but don't expect GPT-4 level performance. Good for code completion, simple refactoring, and explaining snippets. For complex architecture decisions or debugging multi-file codebases, you'll want a larger model like Claude or GPT-4. The 128K context window helps with longer files.
Is Nemotron Nano 9B V2 actually free to use?
Yes, it's completely free through OpenRouter with $0 per million tokens for both input and output. This makes it ideal for high-volume applications, prototyping, or situations where cost matters more than peak performance. No hidden fees, no rate limits beyond OpenRouter's standard throttling.
Can it handle the full 128K context window reliably?
The 128K window is advertised, but smaller models often struggle with recall at maximum context. Expect solid performance up to 32-64K tokens. Beyond that, test your specific use case. For RAG applications or long document analysis, keep critical information in the first and last 20% of your prompt for best results.
How does Nemotron Nano 9B V2 compare to Llama 3.1 8B?
Both are similar-sized open models, but Nemotron offers a larger context window (128K vs 128K for Llama 3.1) and free inference. Llama 3.1 8B generally shows better reasoning on benchmarks. Choose Nemotron when cost is the priority and you need decent quality. Choose Llama when you need slightly better accuracy and can pay.
Should I use this for production chatbots?
Only if budget is your main constraint and user expectations are modest. It works for FAQ bots, simple customer service, or internal tools where occasional mistakes are acceptable. For customer-facing applications where quality matters, spend the money on Claude Haiku or GPT-4o mini instead. The free pricing makes experimentation risk-free, though.