Amazon: Nova Micro 1.0
Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 is a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses in the Amazon Nova family of models at a very low cost. With a context length...
Anyone in the Space can @-mention Amazon: Nova Micro 1.0 with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Space, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- High-volume text classification
- Metadata extraction from documents
- Simple Q&A over structured data
- Cost-sensitive batch processing
- Tagging and labeling pipelines
Strengths
Nova Micro's pricing makes it the cheapest text-only option in its class—roughly one-fifth the cost of GPT-4o Mini on output tokens. The 128K context window accommodates full research papers or long customer transcripts without chunking. Amazon's infrastructure means low-latency responses in AWS regions, which matters for real-time classification or tagging workflows that process thousands of requests per hour.
Trade-offs
Without public benchmarks, we lack hard data on reasoning quality, but Amazon positions this as an entry-level model—expect it to trail GPT-4o Mini, Haiku, or Gemini Flash on tasks requiring multi-hop logic, creative writing, or complex instruction-following. The text-only modality limits use cases compared to vision-capable alternatives. If accuracy on nuanced tasks matters more than cost, you'll need a stronger model.
Specifications
- Provider
- amazon
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 128,000 tokens
- Max output
- 5,120 tokens
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2024-12-05
Pricing
- Input
- $0.04/Mtok
- Output
- $0.14/Mtok
- Model ID
amazon/nova-micro-v1
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amazon | 128k | $0.04/Mtok | $0.14/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Classify Support Tickets
Read this support ticket and classify it into one of these categories: Billing, Technical, Account, Shipping. Return only the category name. Ticket: [paste ticket text here]Open in a Space →
Extract Invoice Fields
Extract the following fields from this invoice: invoice number, date, total amount, vendor name. Return as JSON. Invoice text: [paste invoice here]Open in a Space →
Tag Product Descriptions
Read this product description and generate 5 relevant tags for search and filtering. Return as a comma-separated list. Description: [paste description here]Open in a Space →
Summarize Meeting Notes
Summarize this meeting transcript into 3-5 bullet points covering key decisions and action items. Transcript: [paste transcript here]Open in a Space →
Answer FAQ Questions
Answer this customer question using the FAQ below. Keep the answer concise and direct. FAQ: [paste FAQ here] Question: [paste question here]Open in a Space →
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Extract the key action items from this meeting transcript and assign priority levels. Focus on deliverables with clear owners and deadlines.
Based on the transcript, here are the prioritized action items: HIGH PRIORITY: • Sarah to finalize Q4 budget proposal by Friday EOD (mentioned 3x) • Dev team to patch authentication bug before Monday release MEDIUM PRIORITY: • Marketing to draft campaign brief by next Tuesday • James to schedule follow-up with vendor within 2 weeks LOW PRIORITY: • Review office space options when lease renewal approaches in Q2 Note: Two items lacked clear owners (the analytics dashboard discussion and the training program mention) — recommend clarifying ownership in your next sync.
Nova Micro excels at structured extraction from conversational text, making it cost-effective for high-volume document processing. The 128K context window handles lengthy transcripts without chunking. At $0.04/$0.14 per Mtok, this task costs a fraction of a cent — ideal for batch operations where speed matters less than throughput economics.
Rewrite this customer complaint email in a professional, empathetic tone while preserving all the factual details about the delayed shipment and missing items.
Dear [Customer Name], Thank you for reaching out, and I sincerely apologize for the frustration this situation has caused. I understand your order #47392 was expected on March 3rd but arrived on March 8th, and that two items from your purchase (the blue ceramic mug and the medium tote bag) were missing from the package. This falls short of the experience we aim to provide. I've escalated this to our fulfillment team and arranged for the missing items to ship today via expedited delivery at no charge. You should receive them by March 12th. I'm also applying a 20% credit to your account as an apology for the inconvenience. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to make this right.
This example shows Nova Micro's ability to perform tone transformation while maintaining factual accuracy — a common customer service workflow. The model preserves specific details (order numbers, dates, item descriptions) while softening emotional language. The output quality is sufficient for first-draft support tickets, though human review remains advisable for complex escalations.
Generate 5 multiple-choice quiz questions from this product documentation section about API rate limits. Include one correct answer and three plausible distractors per question.
**Question 1:** What is the default rate limit for authenticated API requests? A) 100 requests per minute B) 500 requests per minute ✓ C) 1,000 requests per minute D) 5,000 requests per minute **Question 2:** Which HTTP header indicates your remaining rate limit quota? A) X-Quota-Remaining B) X-RateLimit-Remaining ✓ C) X-Limit-Available D) X-Request-Balance **Question 3:** What happens when you exceed your rate limit? A) Requests are queued automatically B) You receive a 429 status code ✓ C) Your API key is temporarily suspended D) Requests fail silently with 200 OK [Questions 4-5 would follow the same format, covering retry-after headers and burst allowances]
Nova Micro handles educational content generation efficiently, making it suitable for training material pipelines at scale. The model constructs plausible distractors that test actual comprehension rather than random guessing. The low pricing makes it viable for generating thousands of quiz questions from documentation corpuses, though subject-matter review ensures technical accuracy in specialized domains.
Use-case deep-dives
Nova Micro wins when you're triaging 500+ tickets daily on a tight budget
A 12-person SaaS support team needs to classify incoming tickets by urgency and department before human agents touch them. Nova Micro is the right call here: at $0.04/$0.14 per Mtok, you're paying roughly $0.000018 per classification (assuming 100 input + 30 output tokens). That's $9 per 500,000 tickets. The 128k context window handles full ticket threads plus your routing rules in a single pass. You don't need reasoning depth for this—just fast, cheap pattern matching against known categories. If your accuracy threshold is above 92% or you're routing complex technical issues that need multi-step logic, step up to a reasoning model. Otherwise, Nova Micro delivers the margin you need to scale support without blowing your AI budget.
When you're moderating user posts at scale and speed matters more than nuance
A community platform with 80,000 daily posts needs automated first-pass moderation to flag policy violations before human review. Nova Micro handles this: the pricing structure means you can run every post through the model for under $15/day (assuming 200 tokens average per post). The 128k window lets you include your full moderation policy and recent context in each call. This works if your violations are clear-cut—spam, slurs, obvious ToS breaks. If you're moderating subtle harassment, sarcasm, or context-dependent content where a 3-point accuracy gain matters, you need a larger model. But for high-volume, low-ambiguity moderation where you're optimizing cost per post and human reviewers catch edge cases, Nova Micro is the floor you want.
Nova Micro extracts fields from PDFs when you're processing thousands of similar documents
A 4-person insurance agency digitizes 300 intake forms weekly—pulling names, dates, policy numbers into their CRM. Nova Micro is built for this: the cost is $0.0001 per form (700 input tokens for a scanned form, 50 output tokens for JSON). That's $30 annually per 300-form week. The 128k context means you can include your extraction schema and a few-shot example in every call. This works when your forms follow consistent layouts and the fields are unambiguous. If you're extracting from contracts with nested clauses or medical records where a missed decimal costs you, step up to a model with stronger reasoning. But for high-volume, template-driven extraction where speed and cost trump perfection, Nova Micro clears the bar.
Frequently asked
Is Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 good for basic text tasks?
Yes, Nova Micro 1.0 handles straightforward text work like summarization, simple Q&A, and content classification well. At $0.04/$0.14 per Mtok, it's positioned as Amazon's budget option for high-volume, low-complexity tasks. The 128k context window is adequate for most documents, though we lack public benchmarks to compare quality against GPT-4o-mini or Gemini Flash.
Is Nova Micro cheaper than GPT-4o-mini?
Yes, significantly. Nova Micro costs $0.04 input versus GPT-4o-mini's $0.15, making it 73% cheaper on input tokens. Output pricing ($0.14 vs $0.60) shows an even larger gap. For AWS-native workloads processing millions of tokens daily, this pricing advantage compounds quickly, though you trade off OpenAI's proven benchmark performance.
Can Nova Micro handle 128k tokens reliably?
The 128k context window matches industry standards for mid-tier models, but without public benchmarks we can't verify needle-in-haystack performance or quality degradation at full context. If you're processing entire codebases or long documents, test thoroughly before production deployment. For most business documents under 50k tokens, the window size shouldn't be a constraint.
How does Nova Micro compare to other Amazon Nova models?
Nova Micro sits at the bottom of Amazon's lineup as the speed-and-cost option. Expect faster response times and lower bills than Nova Lite or Pro, but reduced reasoning capability. Use Micro for classification, extraction, and routing tasks where you'd previously used regex or simple ML. Upgrade to Lite when you need better instruction-following or nuanced outputs.
Should I use Nova Micro for customer-facing chatbots?
Only for tightly scoped use cases like FAQ routing or form validation. Without published quality benchmarks, deploying Nova Micro in open-ended customer conversations is risky—you may see more hallucinations or off-topic responses than with Claude or GPT-4o. The pricing makes it tempting for high-volume support, but test conversation quality extensively against your actual user queries first.