ReMM SLERP 13B
A recreation trial of the original MythoMax-L2-B13 but with updated models. #merge
Anyone in the Project can @-mention ReMM SLERP 13B with the team's shared context - pooled credits, one chat, one memory.
Starter is free forever - 1 Project, 100 credits/month, 1 MCP. No card.
Verdict
Best for
- Creative fiction and storytelling
- Character-driven dialogue generation
- Roleplay and interactive narratives
- Budget-conscious creative projects
Strengths
Community merges like ReMM SLERP often excel at maintaining consistent character voice and narrative tone across multi-turn interactions. The SLERP merging approach blends model weights to preserve creative capabilities while reducing repetition common in base 13B models. At $0.35/$0.65 per Mtok, it undercuts frontier models by 90%+ for use cases where creative output matters more than factual accuracy or complex reasoning.
Trade-offs
The 6144-token context window cuts off before most long-form documents or codebases. No public benchmarks means unknown performance on math, coding, or instruction-following compared to Llama 3 8B or Mistral 7B alternatives. Proprietary license limits deployment flexibility. Community merges lack vendor support and may exhibit unpredictable behavior on edge cases outside creative writing domains.
Specifications
- Provider
- undi95
- Category
- llm
- Context length
- 6,144 tokens
- Max output
- 5,529 tokens
- Modalities
- text
- License
- proprietary
- Released
- 2023-07-22
Pricing
- Input
- $0.35/Mtok
- Output
- $0.65/Mtok
- Model ID
undi95/remm-slerp-l2-13b
Per-token prices show what the model costs upstream. On Switchy your team draws from one shared org credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Team cost calculator
5 seats · 80 msgs/day
Switchy meters this against your org's shared credit pool - one plan, one balance for everyone.
Providers
| Provider | Context | Input | Output | P50 latency | Throughput | 30d uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| undi95 | 6k | $0.35/Mtok | $0.65/Mtok | — | — | — |
Performance
Benchmarks
Works well with
Top MCPs
Compatibility data comes from first-party telemetry; once we have enough co-usage signal, top MCPs for this model will appear here.
How Switchy teams use it
Starter prompts
Character Backstory Draft
Write a 300-word backstory for a retired detective who now runs a bookstore in coastal Maine. Include one formative case that still haunts them and shapes how they interact with customers.
Dialogue Scene Expansion
Expand this scene into 200 words of dialogue: Two siblings meet at their childhood home to decide whether to sell it. One wants to preserve memories, the other needs the money. Show their conflict through what they don't say directly.
World-Building Details
Describe the daily morning ritual in a floating city where water is currency. Include sensory details and one social custom that reveals how wealth inequality works in this world.
Story Hook Generator
Give me five different opening hooks for a mystery story set in a small town where everyone knows each other's secrets. Each hook should introduce a crime and one unexpected witness.
Narrative Voice Shift
Rewrite this paragraph from third-person omniscient to first-person unreliable narrator: 'The package arrived on Tuesday. Maria knew she shouldn't open it, but curiosity won. Inside was a photograph of someone she'd never met.'
Example outputs
Illustrative - representative of the model's voice and quality, not literal recordings.
Rewrite this customer support email to be more empathetic while keeping the same information: 'Your refund was denied because you missed the 30-day window. Policy is policy.'
I understand how frustrating this situation must be, and I want to help clarify what happened. Our records show your request came in after our 30-day return period had closed. While I wish I could make an exception, our system doesn't allow refunds beyond that timeframe—it helps us maintain fair pricing for everyone. That said, I'd love to explore other options with you. Would store credit work? Or if there's a product issue we missed, let's discuss that. I'm here to find a solution that feels right.
ReMM SLERP 13B excels at tone-shifting tasks, blending empathy with structure. The 6144-token context handles full email threads comfortably. However, at 13B parameters, nuanced policy edge-cases may require more explicit guidance than larger models need.
Explain how a capacitor works to a 10-year-old who loves video games, then give the technical definition for an engineering student.
For the gamer: Think of a capacitor like a pause button for electricity. When you're playing and hit pause, the game 'holds' everything right where it is—your character, the enemies, the score. A capacitor does that with electrical energy. It catches electrons and holds them until the circuit needs a quick burst, like when your controller rumbles. For the engineer: A capacitor is a passive two-terminal component that stores electrical energy in an electric field between conductive plates separated by a dielectric. Capacitance C = εA/d, where charge accumulation creates a potential difference. Used for filtering, coupling, timing circuits, and energy storage in power applications.
The model's SLERP merge architecture shows strength in multi-audience explanations, maintaining distinct voices without bleed-through. The 6K context is sufficient for comparative explanations, though extended technical deep-dives may hit limits faster than 8K+ models.
I have a Python list of user IDs that might contain duplicates. Write a function that returns only the IDs that appear exactly once, preserving original order.
```python from collections import Counter def get_unique_ids(user_ids): counts = Counter(user_ids) return [uid for uid in user_ids if counts[uid] == 1] ``` This uses Counter to tally occurrences in a single pass, then filters the original list to preserve order. For large datasets, consider that Counter builds a full frequency map—if memory is tight and the list is already sorted, a two-pointer approach might be more efficient. The list comprehension keeps it readable for most production use cases.
At 13B parameters, ReMM SLERP handles common coding patterns cleanly with practical commentary. The context window supports typical function-plus-explanation requests. For complex refactoring across multiple files or architectural decisions, larger models with 32K+ context offer more room to reason.
Use-case deep-dives
When ReMM SLERP 13B fits small creative teams on tight budgets
A 3-person indie game studio writing NPC dialogue and item descriptions will find ReMM SLERP 13B hits the sweet spot between cost and narrative quality. At $0.35/$0.65 per Mtok, you're paying roughly half what GPT-4 charges, and the 13B parameter count delivers coherent character voice across 6,144 tokens—enough for a full quest chain or character backstory in one pass. The SLERP merge technique blends multiple fine-tunes, which historically produces models that handle creative tasks better than single-purpose alternatives at this size. If you're generating under 500K tokens monthly and need consistent tone without enterprise pricing, this model works. Beyond that volume or if you need factual accuracy for lore wikis, step up to a larger model with verifiable benchmarks.
ReMM SLERP 13B as a fast-iteration prototype layer before production
A 5-person SaaS team building an onboarding chatbot can use ReMM SLERP 13B to test conversation flows and prompt structures before committing to a production model. The 6,144-token window covers typical onboarding threads (welcome message, 3-4 feature explanations, FAQ fallback), and the $0.35 input rate means you can burn through 50 test conversations for under $2. The lack of public benchmarks is a red flag for production deployment—you don't know how it handles edge cases or adversarial inputs—but for internal iteration where you're validating UX and prompt design, the price-to-speed ratio justifies the risk. Once your flows stabilize and you're ready for real users, migrate to a benchmarked model with documented safety guardrails and lock in your prompt templates.
When ReMM SLERP 13B covers occasional customer reply generation
A 4-person consulting firm handling 10-15 client emails daily can route straightforward replies through ReMM SLERP 13B and save 60% versus mainstream alternatives. The model's 6,144-token context fits a full email thread (original inquiry, 2-3 back-and-forths, internal notes), and at $0.65 per Mtok output, drafting 200-word responses costs fractions of a cent. The SLERP merge approach typically preserves instruction-following for structured tasks like email tone matching, though without benchmarks you're flying blind on factual accuracy—fine for scheduling and logistics, risky for technical recommendations. If your volume crosses 100 emails/day or you need compliance-grade audit trails, switch to a model with documented performance on business communication benchmarks and version-locked APIs.
Frequently asked
Is ReMM SLERP 13B good for general text generation?
Yes, for creative writing and roleplay scenarios. ReMM SLERP is a merge of fine-tuned models optimized for conversational coherence and character consistency. It handles dialogue and narrative generation well but isn't designed for code, math, or structured data tasks. If you need factual accuracy or reasoning, use a base model like Llama 2 13B instead.
Is ReMM SLERP 13B cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo?
No. At $0.35/$0.65 per Mtok, ReMM costs roughly 70% more than GPT-3.5 Turbo's $0.50/$1.50 per Mtok blended rate for typical workloads. The pricing makes sense only if you need the specific merge characteristics or want to avoid OpenAI's content filters. For cost-sensitive general use, GPT-3.5 or open-weight Llama alternatives are better.
Can ReMM SLERP 13B handle 6000-token conversations?
Barely. The 6144-token context window includes both input and output, so a 6000-token conversation leaves only 144 tokens for the model's response. For multi-turn chat, you'll hit limits fast. Plan to summarize or truncate history after 4-5 exchanges. Models like Claude Instant (100k) or GPT-4 Turbo (128k) are better for long conversations.
How does ReMM SLERP 13B compare to base Llama 2 13B?
ReMM is a SLERP merge of instruction-tuned variants, so it's more creative and conversational than base Llama 2 13B but less predictable for structured tasks. Expect better dialogue flow and character voice but weaker performance on benchmarks requiring factual recall or logical reasoning. Use ReMM for fiction; use Llama 2 for everything else.
Should I use ReMM SLERP 13B for a production chatbot?
Only if your chatbot is for creative roleplay or entertainment. The model's merge origins mean behavior can be inconsistent across edge cases, and the 6k context window is too small for customer support or complex workflows. For production chat, use GPT-4, Claude, or a commercially supported fine-tune with longer context and reliability guarantees.
Compare with
More language models
- Sakana: Fugu Maxsakana
- Sakana: Fugu Ultrasakana
- Sakana: Fugu Ultra v2sakana
- Sakana: Sakana Namazusakana
- Sao10K: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2sao10k
- Sao10K: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70Bsao10k
- Sao10K: Llama 3 8B Lunarissao10k
- ScaleDown: Extractscaledown
- ScaleDown: Summarizescaledown
- SpaceXAI: Grok 4.20x-ai
- SpaceXAI: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agentx-ai
- SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3x-ai